504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26685634)
1. ORTHODONTIC RETENTION. Studies of retention capacity, cost-effectiveness and long-term stability.
Tynelius GE
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2014; (236):9-65. PubMed ID: 26685634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. No differences seen in outcomes between three different methods of orthodontic retention.
Walker M
Evid Based Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):81-2. PubMed ID: 24071676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized controlled trial of three orthodontic retention methods in Class I four premolar extraction cases -- stability after 2 years in retention.
Edman Tynelius G; Bondemark L; Lilja-Karlander E
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 May; 16(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 23324112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment after 1 year of retention--a randomized controlled trial.
Edman Tynelius G; Bondemark L; Lilja-Karlander E
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):542-7. PubMed ID: 20080961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. FIXED OR REMOVABLE APPLIANCE FOR EARLY ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF FUNCTIONAL ANTERIOR CROSSBITE.
Wiedel AP
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2015; (238):10-72. PubMed ID: 26939312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Five-year postretention outcomes of three retention methods--a randomized controlled trial.
Edman Tynelius G; Petrén S; Bondemark L; Lilja-Karlander E
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Aug; 37(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 25452629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Orthodontic retention--three methods trialed.
Cope JF; Lamont T
Evid Based Dent; 2016 Mar; 17(1):29-30. PubMed ID: 27012577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A cost-minimization analysis of an RCT of three retention methods.
Tynelius GE; Lilja-Karlander E; Petrén S
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Aug; 36(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 24084630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost analysis of two types of fixed maxillary retainers and a removable vacuum-formed maxillary retainer: a randomized controlled trial.
Sonesson M; Naraghi S; Bondemark L
Eur J Orthod; 2022 Mar; 44(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 35021204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome in relation to retention status: An 8-year follow-up.
Steinnes J; Johnsen G; Kerosuo H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1027-1033. PubMed ID: 28554448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stability of maxillary anterior teeth after 2 years of retention in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial comparing two bonded and a vacuum-formed retainer.
Naraghi S; Ganzer N; Bondemark L; Sonesson M
Eur J Orthod; 2021 Apr; 43(2):152-158. PubMed ID: 33351886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stability of maxillary anterior teeth during retention and 1 year after removal of retention-an RCT on adolescents retained with two different bonded retainers and a vacuum-formed retainer.
Naraghi S; Ganzer N; Bondemark L; Sonesson M
Eur J Orthod; 2023 Nov; 45(6):629-636. PubMed ID: 37119264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 1: stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months.
Forde K; Storey M; Littlewood SJ; Scott P; Luther F; Kang J
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):387-398. PubMed ID: 29059289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of bonded and vacuum-formed retainers: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
O'Rourke N; Albeedh H; Sharma P; Johal A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Sep; 150(3):406-15. PubMed ID: 27585768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term effectiveness of canine-to-canine bonded flexible spiral wire lingual retainers.
Renkema AM; Renkema A; Bronkhorst E; Katsaros C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):614-21. PubMed ID: 21536204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of efficacy of thermoplastic retainer with round and rectangular bonded lingual wire retainer in the mandible two years after orthodontic treatment: a randomised controlled trial.
Kanizaj Ugrin S; Špalj S
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Mar; 28(3):183. PubMed ID: 38424224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The origin and evolution of the Hawley retainer for the effectiveness to maintain tooth position after fixed orthodontic treatment compare to vacuum-formed retainer: A systematic review of RCTs.
Outhaisavanh S; Liu Y; Song J
Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):225-236. PubMed ID: 32201168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Factors affecting stability after fixed orthodontic treatment].
Ren SS; Dai X; Ying M; Wang WX; Chang J; Hou ZM
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 53(9):599-603. PubMed ID: 30196619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Which orthodontic retention protocol should I implement? A critical assessment of a randomised controlled trial.
Steegmans PAJ; Cavagnetto D; Reynders RAM
Evid Based Dent; 2022 Dec; 23(4):162-165. PubMed ID: 36526846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Post-treatment stability after 5 years of retention with vacuum-formed and bonded retainers-a randomized controlled trial.
Krämer A; Sjöström M; Apelthun C; Hallman M; Feldmann I
Eur J Orthod; 2023 Feb; 45(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 35968668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
