BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26685777)

  • 1. Estimation of variance and genomic prediction using genotypes imputed from low-density marker subsets for carcass traits in Japanese black cattle.
    Ogawa S; Matsuda H; Taniguchi Y; Watanabe T; Sugimoto Y; Iwaisaki H
    Anim Sci J; 2016 Sep; 87(9):1106-13. PubMed ID: 26685777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of variance components for carcass traits in Japanese Black cattle using 50K SNP genotype data.
    Watanabe T; Matsuda H; Arakawa A; Yamada T; Iwaisaki H; Nishimura S; Sugimoto Y
    Anim Sci J; 2014 Jan; 85(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 23638736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes from low-density panels in Japanese Black cattle.
    Ogawa S; Matsuda H; Taniguchi Y; Watanabe T; Takasuga A; Sugimoto Y; Iwaisaki H
    Anim Sci J; 2016 Jan; 87(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 26032028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of single nucleotide polymorphism marker density on degree of genetic variance explained and genomic evaluation for carcass traits in Japanese Black beef cattle.
    Ogawa S; Matsuda H; Taniguchi Y; Watanabe T; Nishimura S; Sugimoto Y; Iwaisaki H
    BMC Genet; 2014 Feb; 15():15. PubMed ID: 24491120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy.
    Bolormaa S; Gore K; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
    Anim Genet; 2015 Oct; 46(5):544-56. PubMed ID: 26360638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The feasibility of using low-density marker panels for genotype imputation and genomic prediction of crossbred dairy cattle of East Africa.
    Aliloo H; Mrode R; Okeyo AM; Ni G; Goddard ME; Gibson JP
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Oct; 101(10):9108-9127. PubMed ID: 30077450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assets of imputation to ultra-high density for productive and functional traits.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; Gianola D; Weigel K; Alenda R; González-Recio O
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6047-58. PubMed ID: 23810591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of the autosomal contribution to total additive genetic variability of carcass traits in Japanese Black cattle.
    Ogawa S; Matsuda H; Taniguchi Y; Watanabe T; Sugimoto Y; Iwaisaki H
    Anim Sci J; 2022; 93(1):e13710. PubMed ID: 35416392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genotype imputation from various low-density SNP panels and its impact on accuracy of genomic breeding values in pigs.
    Grossi DA; Brito LF; Jafarikia M; Schenkel FS; Feng Z
    Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2235-2245. PubMed ID: 29706144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genotype Imputation To Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Farmed Atlantic Salmon.
    Tsai HY; Matika O; Edwards SM; Antolín-Sánchez R; Hamilton A; Guy DR; Tinch AE; Gharbi K; Stear MJ; Taggart JB; Bron JE; Hickey JM; Houston RD
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Apr; 7(4):1377-1383. PubMed ID: 28250015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imputation of genotypes with low-density chips and its effect on reliability of direct genomic values in Dutch Holstein cattle.
    Mulder HA; Calus MP; Druet T; Schrooten C
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):876-89. PubMed ID: 22281352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes.
    Piccoli ML; Brito LF; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 28100165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for carcass merit traits in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
    Chen L; Vinsky M; Li C
    Anim Genet; 2015 Feb; 46(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 25393962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing strategies for selection of low-density SNPs for imputation-mediated genomic prediction in U. S. Holsteins.
    He J; Xu J; Wu XL; Bauck S; Lee J; Morota G; Kachman SD; Spangler ML
    Genetica; 2018 Apr; 146(2):137-149. PubMed ID: 29243001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations.
    Dassonneville R; Brøndum RF; Druet T; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Ducrocq V; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jul; 94(7):3679-86. PubMed ID: 21700057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multi-generational imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes and accuracy of genomic selection.
    Toghiani S; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
    Animal; 2016 Jul; 10(7):1077-85. PubMed ID: 27076192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle.
    Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Kemper K; Savin K; Hayes BJ; Barendse W; Zhang Y; Reich CM; Mason BA; Bunch RJ; Harrison BE; Reverter A; Herd RM; Tier B; Graser HU; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3088-104. PubMed ID: 23658330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of non-additive genetic effects on carcass and meat quality traits in Korean Hanwoo cattle using genomic models.
    Bhuiyan MSA; Kim YK; Lee DH; Chung Y; Lee DJ; Kang JM; Lee SH
    Animal; 2024 May; 18(5):101152. PubMed ID: 38701710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of QTL minor allele frequency on genomic evaluation using real genotype data and simulated phenotypes in Japanese Black cattle.
    Uemoto Y; Sasaki S; Kojima T; Sugimoto Y; Watanabe T
    BMC Genet; 2015 Nov; 16():134. PubMed ID: 26586567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic relationships based on X chromosome markers and accuracy of genomic predictions with and without X chromosome markers.
    Su G; Guldbrandtsen B; Aamand GP; Strandén I; Lund MS
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jul; 46(1):47. PubMed ID: 25080199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.