These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26685850)
1. Assessment of postoperative pain after reciprocating or rotary NiTi instrumentation of root canals: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Relvas JB; Bastos MM; Marques AA; Garrido AD; Sponchiado EC Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):1987-1993. PubMed ID: 26685850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postoperative endodontic pain of three different instrumentation techniques in asymptomatic necrotic mandibular molars with periapical lesion: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Shokraneh A; Ajami M; Farhadi N; Hosseini M; Rohani B Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):413-418. PubMed ID: 27041109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Incidence of Postoperative Pain after Using 2 Reciprocating Systems and a Continuous Rotary System: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Kherlakian D; Cunha RS; Ehrhardt IC; Zuolo ML; Kishen A; da Silveira Bueno CE J Endod; 2016 Feb; 42(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 26614017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of two rotary and two reciprocating NiTi systems on postoperative pain after root canal retreatment on single-rooted incisor teeth: A randomized controlled trial. Çanakçi BC; Er Ö; Genç Şen Ö; Süt N Int Endod J; 2021 Nov; 54(11):2016-2024. PubMed ID: 34383324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Postoperative quality of life following single-visit root canal treatment performed by rotary or reciprocating instrumentation: a randomized clinical trial. Pasqualini D; Corbella S; Alovisi M; Taschieri S; Del Fabbro M; Migliaretti G; Carpegna GC; Scotti N; Berutti E Int Endod J; 2016 Nov; 49(11):1030-1039. PubMed ID: 26468626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pain after single-visit root canal treatment with two single-file systems based on different kinematics--a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Neelakantan P; Sharma S Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Dec; 19(9):2211-7. PubMed ID: 25773449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with several NiTi systems. Dincer AN; Er O; Canakci BC Int Endod J; 2015 Dec; 48(12):1194-8. PubMed ID: 25557631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Postoperative Pain Following Single-Visit Root Canal Treatment with Rotary and Reciprocal Ni-Ti File Systems in Children. Atesci AA; Topaloglu-Ak A; Turan E; Oncag O; Kaval ME Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Dec; 58(1):. PubMed ID: 35056358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of postoperative pain after foraminal enlargement of necrotic teeth using continuous rotary system and reciprocating instrument: A randomized clinical trial. Kurnaz S Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Feb; 23(2):212-218. PubMed ID: 32031096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of three nickel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. Gergi R; Osta N; Bourbouze G; Zgheib C; Arbab-Chirani R; Naaman A Int Endod J; 2015 Feb; 48(2):162-70. PubMed ID: 24717063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. Bürklein S; Schäfer E J Endod; 2012 Jun; 38(6):850-2. PubMed ID: 22595125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of 2 reciprocating systems compared with a rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal. Rios Mde A; Villela AM; Cunha RS; Velasco RC; De Martin AS; Kato AS; Bueno CE J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):543-6. PubMed ID: 24666908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postoperative pain following endodontic irrigation using 1.3% versus 5.25% sodium hypochlorite in mandibular molars with necrotic pulps: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Mostafa MEHAA; El-Shrief YAI; Anous WIO; Hassan MW; Salamah FTA; El Boghdadi RM; El-Bayoumi MAA; Seyam RM; Abd-El-Kader KG; Amin SAW Int Endod J; 2020 Feb; 53(2):154-166. PubMed ID: 31563148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Clinical evaluation on the preparation of cured root canals with Reciproc and Pathfile rotary instruments]. Chen F; Qiao JY; Li XF Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2013 Jun; 22(3):338-41. PubMed ID: 23852069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of retreatment ability of full-sequence reciprocating instrumentation and 360° rotary instrumentation. Capar ID; Gok T; Orhan E Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Dec; 19(9):2219-22. PubMed ID: 25820924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Post endodontic pain following single-visit root canal preparation with rotary vs reciprocating instruments: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Hou XM; Su Z; Hou BX BMC Oral Health; 2017 May; 17(1):86. PubMed ID: 28545437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the effect of root canal preparation by using WaveOne and ProTaper on postoperative pain: a randomized clinical trial. Nekoofar MH; Sheykhrezae MS; Meraji N; Jamee A; Shirvani A; Jamee J; Dummer PM J Endod; 2015 May; 41(5):575-8. PubMed ID: 25720984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation. Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]