158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26686479)
21. Understanding the performance of sulfate reducing bacteria based packed bed reactor by growth kinetics study and microbial profiling.
Dev S; Roy S; Bhattacharya J
J Environ Manage; 2016 Jul; 177():101-10. PubMed ID: 27085153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bioremediation of acid mine drainage using sulfate-reducing wetland bioreactor: Filling substrates influence, sulfide oxidation and microbial community.
Wang H; Zhang M; Dong P; Xue J; Liu L
Chemosphere; 2024 Feb; 349():140789. PubMed ID: 38013025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of acidic pH and presence of metals as parameters in establishing a sulfidogenic process in anaerobic reactor.
Vieira BF; Couto PT; Sancinetti GP; Klein B; van Zyl D; Rodriguez RP
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2016 Aug; 51(10):793-7. PubMed ID: 27222283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Alkaline textile wastewater biotreatment: A sulfate-reducing granular sludge based lab-scale study.
Zeng Q; Hao T; Mackey HR; Wei L; Guo G; Chen G
J Hazard Mater; 2017 Jun; 332():104-111. PubMed ID: 28285103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Arsenic removal in a sulfidogenic fixed-bed column bioreactor.
Altun M; Sahinkaya E; Durukan I; Bektas S; Komnitsas K
J Hazard Mater; 2014 Mar; 269():31-7. PubMed ID: 24360509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Co-treatment of acid mine drainage with municipal wastewater: performance evaluation.
Hughes TA; Gray NF
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2013 Nov; 20(11):7863-77. PubMed ID: 23161500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. System evaluation and microbial analysis of a sulfur cycle-based wastewater treatment process for Co-treatment of simple wet flue gas desulfurization wastes with freshwater sewage.
Qian J; Liu R; Wei L; Lu H; Chen GH
Water Res; 2015 Sep; 80():189-99. PubMed ID: 26001823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Activity of sulphate reducing bacteria according to COD/SO4(2-) ratio of acrylonitrile wastewater containing high sulphate.
Byun IG; Lee TH; Kim YO; Song SK; Park TJ
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):229-35. PubMed ID: 15137428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Desulfotomaculum carboxydivorans sp. nov., a novel sulfate-reducing bacterium capable of growth at 100% CO.
Parshina SN; Sipma J; Nakashimada Y; Henstra AM; Smidt H; Lysenko AM; Lens PNL; Lettinga G; Stams AJM
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2005 Sep; 55(Pt 5):2159-2165. PubMed ID: 16166725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sulfidogenic fluidized-bed treatment of metal-containing wastewater at low and high temperatures.
Sahinkaya E; Ozkaya B; Kaksonen AH; Puhakka JA
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Apr; 96(6):1064-72. PubMed ID: 17004272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. pH-dependent biological sulfidogenic processes for metal-laden wastewater treatment: Sulfate reduction or sulfur reduction?
Guo J; Li Y; Sun J; Sun R; Zhou S; Duan J; Feng W; Liu G; Jiang F
Water Res; 2021 Oct; 204():117628. PubMed ID: 34507021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sulfate-reducing bacterial community structure and their contribution to carbon mineralization in a wastewater biofilm growing under microaerophilic conditions.
Okabe S; Ito T; Satoh H
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2003 Dec; 63(3):322-34. PubMed ID: 12879306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sulfidogenic fluidized bed treatment of real acid mine drainage water.
Sahinkaya E; Gunes FM; Ucar D; Kaksonen AH
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):683-9. PubMed ID: 20832297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Realizing a high-rate sulfidogenic reactor driven by sulfur-reducing bacteria with organic substrate dosage minimization and cost-effectiveness maximization.
Guo J; Wang J; Qiu Y; Sun J; Jiang F
Chemosphere; 2019 Dec; 236():124381. PubMed ID: 31545190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Enhanced reduction of sulfate by iron-carbon microelectrolysis: interaction mechanism between microelectrolysis and microorganisms.
Li H; Di J; Dong Y; Bao S; Fu S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 May; 31(21):31577-31589. PubMed ID: 38635092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A novel sulfidogenic process via sulfur reduction to remove arsenate in acid mine drainage: Insights into the performance and microbial mechanisms.
Gou J; Xia J; Li Y; Qiu Y; Jiang F
Water Res; 2024 May; 254():121423. PubMed ID: 38461598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Competitive oxidation of volatile fatty acids by sulfate- and nitrate-reducing bacteria from an oil field in Argentina.
Grigoryan AA; Cornish SL; Buziak B; Lin S; Cavallaro A; Arensdorf JJ; Voordouw G
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2008 Jul; 74(14):4324-35. PubMed ID: 18502934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Physicochemical and biological characterization of long-term operated sulfate reducing granular sludge in the SANI® process.
Hao T; Luo J; Wei L; Mackey HR; Liu R; Rey Morito G; Chen GH
Water Res; 2015 Mar; 71():74-84. PubMed ID: 25600299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of the sulfate-reducing bacterial population associated with stored swine slurry.
Cook KL; Whitehead TR; Spence C; Cotta MA
Anaerobe; 2008 Jun; 14(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 18457964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Preparation of metal-resistant immobilized sulfate reducing bacteria beads for acid mine drainage treatment.
Zhang M; Wang H; Han X
Chemosphere; 2016 Jul; 154():215-223. PubMed ID: 27058913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
