These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26686530)

  • 21. Dynamic modulation of illusory and physical target size on separate and coordinated eye and hand movements.
    Gamble CM; Song JH
    J Vis; 2017 Mar; 17(3):23. PubMed ID: 28362898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Manual-aiming bias and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the roles of position and extent information.
    Predebon J
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 May; 163(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 15654590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Delayed pointing movements to masked Müller-Lyer figures are affected by target size but not the illusion.
    de Wit M; van der Kamp J; Masters RS
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1903-9. PubMed ID: 21420989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of action intentionality and effector in the subjective expansion of temporal duration after saccadic eye movements.
    Melcher D; Kumar D; Srinivasan N
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16922. PubMed ID: 33037289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of practice versus information on the visual illusion.
    Khorasani AA; Fadardi JS; Fadardi MS; Cox WM; Sharif JT
    Neurosci Bull; 2007 Jan; 23(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 17592522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ventral and dorsal stream interactions during the perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion: evidence derived from fMRI and dynamic causal modeling.
    Plewan T; Weidner R; Eickhoff SB; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Oct; 24(10):2015-29. PubMed ID: 22721374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of illusory line motion on incongruent saccades: implications for saccadic eye movements and visual attention.
    Crawford TJ; Kean M; Klein RM; Hamm JP
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 173(3):498-506. PubMed ID: 16528498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review.
    Bruno N; Franz VH
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1421-33. PubMed ID: 19059422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Memory-guided saccades show effect of a perceptual illusion whereas visually guided saccades do not.
    Massendari D; Lisi M; Collins T; Cavanagh P
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Jan; 119(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 28954892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contributions of gaze-centered and object-centered coding in a double-step saccade task.
    de Brouwer AJ; Medendorp WP; Smeets JB
    J Vis; 2016 Nov; 16(14):12. PubMed ID: 27846340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of Kanizsa's compression illusion on reflexive saccades.
    Knox PC
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 175(4):764-8. PubMed ID: 17051374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dorsal and ventral visual stream contributions to perception-action interactions during pointing.
    Lee JH; van Donkelaar P
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Apr; 143(4):440-6. PubMed ID: 11914789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Shift in saccadic direction induced in humans by proprioceptive manipulation: a comparison between memory-guided and visually guided saccades.
    Allin F; Velay JL; Bouquerel A
    Exp Brain Res; 1996 Aug; 110(3):473-81. PubMed ID: 8871106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Saccadic updating of object orientation for grasping movements.
    Selen LP; Medendorp WP
    Vision Res; 2011 Apr; 51(8):898-907. PubMed ID: 21232550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Adaptation effects in grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Kopiske KK; Cesanek E; Campagnoli C; Domini F
    Vision Res; 2017 Jul; 136():21-31. PubMed ID: 28571701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Duncker illusion and eye-hand coordination.
    Soechting JF; Engel KC; Flanders M
    J Neurophysiol; 2001 Feb; 85(2):843-54. PubMed ID: 11160517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Another look at the Müller-Lyer illusion: different gaze patterns in vision for action and perception.
    van Doorn H; van der Kamp J; de Wit M; Savelsbergh GJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):804-12. PubMed ID: 19118565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of saccade metrics on the corollary discharge contribution to perceived eye location.
    Bansal S; Jayet Bray LC; Peterson MS; Joiner WM
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 May; 113(9):3312-22. PubMed ID: 25761955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure.
    Westwood DA; McEachern T; Roy EA
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Nov; 141(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 11713628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perisaccadic mislocalization of visual targets by head-free gaze shifts: visual or motor?
    van Wetter SM; van Opstal AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 100(4):1848-67. PubMed ID: 18436630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.