BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26686564)

  • 1. Ecology of a key ecosystem engineer on hard coastal infrastructure and natural rocky shores.
    Martins GM; Neto AI; Cacabelos E
    Mar Environ Res; 2016 Feb; 113():88-94. PubMed ID: 26686564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental evaluation of early patterns of colonisation of space on rocky shores and seawalls.
    Bulleri F
    Mar Environ Res; 2005 Sep; 60(3):355-74. PubMed ID: 15769504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of environmental variables over multiple spatial scales on the population structure of a key marine invertebrate.
    Pardal A; Cordeiro CAMM; Ciotti ÁM; Jenkins SR; Giménez L; Burrows MT; Christofoletti RA
    Mar Environ Res; 2021 Aug; 170():105410. PubMed ID: 34271484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parasite and host biomass and reproductive output in barnacle populations in the rocky intertidal zone.
    Fong CR; Kuris AM; Hechinger RF
    Parasitology; 2019 Mar; 146(3):407-412. PubMed ID: 30301482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cool barnacles: Do common biogenic structures enhance or retard rates of deterioration of intertidal rocks and concrete?
    Coombes MA; Viles HA; Naylor LA; La Marca EC
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Feb; 580():1034-1045. PubMed ID: 28012651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bioerosive and bioprotective role of barnacles on rocky shores.
    Pappalardo M; Maggi E; Geppini C; Pannacciulli F
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Apr; 619-620():83-92. PubMed ID: 29145057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Urban shading and artificial light at night alter natural light regimes and affect marine intertidal assemblages.
    Trethewy M; Mayer-Pinto M; Dafforn KA
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2023 Aug; 193():115203. PubMed ID: 37392591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of spatial structure of population size on the population dynamics of barnacles across their elevational range.
    Fukaya K; Okuda T; Nakaoka M; Noda T
    J Anim Ecol; 2014 Nov; 83(6):1334-43. PubMed ID: 24738826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fucus vesiculosus populations on artificial structures have potentially reduced fecundity and are dislodged at greater rates than on natural shores.
    Drakard VF; Brooks P; Crowe TP; Earp HS; Thompson B; Bourke N; George R; Piper C; Moore PJ
    Mar Environ Res; 2021 Jun; 168():105324. PubMed ID: 33845257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental analyses of the structure and dynamics of mid-shore rocky intertidal communities in New South Wales.
    Underwood AJ; Denley EJ; Moran MJ
    Oecologia; 1983 Feb; 56(2-3):202-219. PubMed ID: 28310196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new Chthamalus (Crustacea: Cirripedia) from the challengeri subgroup on Taiwan rocky intertidal shores.
    Chan BK; Cheang CC
    Zootaxa; 2015 Aug; 4000(5):547-58. PubMed ID: 26623745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seasonality in the strength and spatial scale of processes determining intertidal barnacle population growth.
    Fukaya K; Okuda T; Nakaoka M; Hori M; Noda T
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Nov; 79(6):1270-9. PubMed ID: 20636347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Competing species in a changing climate: effects of recruitment disturbances on two interacting barnacle species.
    Svensson CJ; Johansson E; Aberg P
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 May; 75(3):765-76. PubMed ID: 16689959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hard coastal-defence structures as habitats for native and exotic rocky-bottom species.
    Vaselli S; Bulleri F; Benedetti-Cecchi L
    Mar Environ Res; 2008 Oct; 66(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 18656256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The population structure, sex ratio and reproductive potential of limpets (Patella spp.) on natural shores and artificial structures in the Irish Sea.
    Earp HS; George R; Brooks PR; Farrugia Drakard V; Thompson BJ; Fisher B; Hayden R; Crowe TP; Moore PJ
    Mar Environ Res; 2023 Feb; 184():105853. PubMed ID: 36584493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Asymmetric coexistence: bidirectional abiotic and biotic effects between goose barnacles and mussels.
    Kawai T; Tokeshi M
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Jul; 75(4):928-41. PubMed ID: 17009756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial variation of intertidal assemblages at Tavolara-Capo Coda Cavallo MPA (NE Sardinia): geographical vs. protection effect.
    Ceccherelli G; Casu D; Sechi N
    Mar Environ Res; 2005 Jun; 59(5):533-46. PubMed ID: 15603773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Urban structures as marine habitats: an experimental comparison of the composition and abundance of subtidal epibiota among pilings, pontoons and rocky reefs.
    Connell SD
    Mar Environ Res; 2001 Aug; 52(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 11525426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-linear density-dependent effects of an intertidal ecosystem engineer.
    Harley CD; O'Riley JL
    Oecologia; 2011 Jun; 166(2):531-41. PubMed ID: 21170751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining traits and density to model recruitment of sessile organisms.
    Giménez L; Jenkins SR
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e57849. PubMed ID: 23469247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.