These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26686799)

  • 1. Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models to Evaluate Inconsistency within a Network Meta-Analysis.
    Tu YK
    Value Health; 2015 Dec; 18(8):1120-5. PubMed ID: 26686799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Node-Splitting Generalized Linear Mixed Models for Evaluation of Inconsistency in Network Meta-Analysis.
    Yu-Kang T
    Value Health; 2016 Dec; 19(8):957-963. PubMed ID: 27987646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating network meta-analysis and inconsistency using arm-parameterized model in structural equation modeling.
    Shih MC; Tu YK
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):240-254. PubMed ID: 30834677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linear mixed model approach to network meta-analysis for continuous outcomes in periodontal research.
    Tu YK
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Feb; 42(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 25581572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of generalized linear mixed models for network meta-analysis.
    Tu YK
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Oct; 34(7):911-8. PubMed ID: 25260872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visualizing the flow of evidence in network meta-analysis and characterizing mixed treatment comparisons.
    König J; Krahn U; Binder H
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5414-29. PubMed ID: 24123165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
    Jackson D; Barrett JK; Rice S; White IR; Higgins JP
    Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(21):3639-54. PubMed ID: 24777711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis and meta-regression with integrated nested Laplace approximations.
    Günhan BK; Friede T; Held L
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):179-194. PubMed ID: 29193801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostics for generalized linear hierarchical models in network meta-analysis.
    Zhao H; Hodges JS; Carlin BP
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Sep; 8(3):333-342. PubMed ID: 28683516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies.
    Higgins JP; Jackson D; Barrett JK; Lu G; Ades AE; White IR
    Res Synth Methods; 2012 Jun; 3(2):98-110. PubMed ID: 26062084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of two-way linear mixed models in multitreatment meta-analysis.
    Piepho HP; Williams ER; Madden LV
    Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1269-77. PubMed ID: 22845838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evidence-splitting approach to evaluation of direct-indirect evidence inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
    Shih MC; Tu YK
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Mar; 12(2):226-238. PubMed ID: 33543575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hierarchical Bayesian approaches for detecting inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
    Zhao H; Hodges JS; Ma H; Jiang Q; Carlin BP
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3524-36. PubMed ID: 27037506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiplicative interaction in network meta-analysis.
    Piepho HP; Madden LV; Williams ER
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(4):582-94. PubMed ID: 25410043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Graphical exploration of network meta-analysis data: the use of multidimensional scaling.
    Chung H; Lumley T
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 18697844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Network-meta analysis made easy: detection of inconsistency using factorial analysis-of-variance models.
    Piepho HP
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 May; 14():61. PubMed ID: 24885590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2.
    Hoaglin DC; Hawkins N; Jansen JP; Scott DA; Itzler R; Cappelleri JC; Boersma C; Thompson D; Larholt KM; Diaz M; Barrett A
    Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 21669367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new approach to evaluating loop inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
    Turner RM; Band T; Morris TP; Fisher DJ; Higgins JPT; Carpenter JR; White IR
    Stat Med; 2023 Nov; 42(27):4917-4930. PubMed ID: 37767752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.
    Jansen JP; Fleurence R; Devine B; Itzler R; Barrett A; Hawkins N; Lee K; Boersma C; Annemans L; Cappelleri JC
    Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):417-28. PubMed ID: 21669366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multilevel approach to network meta-analysis within a frequentist framework.
    Greco T; Edefonti V; Biondi-Zoccai G; Decarli A; Gasparini M; Zangrillo A; Landoni G
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 May; 42():51-9. PubMed ID: 25804722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.