96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26686874)
1. Surgical mortality audit data validity.
Rey-Conde T; Shakya R; Allen J; Clarke E; North JB; Wysocki AP; Ware RS
ANZ J Surg; 2016 Sep; 86(9):644-7. PubMed ID: 26686874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of the causes and effects of delay before diagnosis using surgical mortality data.
North JB; Blackford FJ; Wall D; Allen J; Faint S; Ware RS; Rey-Conde T
Br J Surg; 2013 Feb; 100(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 23225342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality: concordance between reported and audited clinical events and delays in management in surgical mortality patients.
Raju RS; Guy GS; Field JB; Kiroff GK; Babidge W; Maddern GJ
ANZ J Surg; 2014 Sep; 84(9):618-23. PubMed ID: 24754257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical versus surgical causes of death following colorectal resection: a Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) study.
Mao D; Rey-Conde T; North JB; Lancashire RP; Naidu S; Chua T
ANZ J Surg; 2024 Apr; 94(4):684-690. PubMed ID: 38149760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Critical Analysis of the Causes of In-Hospital Mortality following Colorectal Resection: A Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) Registry Study.
Mao D; Rey-Conde T; North JB; Lancashire RP; Naidu S; Chua TC
World J Surg; 2022 Jul; 46(7):1796-1804. PubMed ID: 35378596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variability in the quality of rectal cancer care in public hospitals in Catalonia (Spain): clinical audit as a basis for action.
Manchon-Walsh P; Borras JM; Espinas JA; Aliste L;
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Apr; 37(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 21296543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical hospital audit of record keeping (SHARK)--a new audit tool for the improvement in surgical record keeping.
Grewal P
J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(3):373-6. PubMed ID: 23618448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Informatics and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: automated processes could replace manual record review.
Hanauer DA; Englesbe MJ; Cowan JA; Campbell DA
J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Jan; 208(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 19228500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of data submitted by the treating surgeon in the Victorian Audit of Surgical Mortality.
Hansen D; Hansen E; Retegan C; Morphet J; Beiles CB
ANZ J Surg; 2019 Jan; 89(1-2):16-19. PubMed ID: 30497110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Elective foot and ankle surgery; activity and perioperative complications in Queensland public hospitals, Australia.
Cichero MJ
Foot (Edinb); 2009 Sep; 19(3):139-44. PubMed ID: 20307466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benefits and pitfalls of national mortality audits.
Karthikesalingam A; Holt PJ
ANZ J Surg; 2014 Sep; 84(9):601-2. PubMed ID: 25159564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Causes of postoperative mortality in a period of 11 years (1922-1931) at Surgical Clinic of Cluj. 1934].
Iacobovici I; Mureşan I
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2011; 106(5):639-47; discussion 647-8. PubMed ID: 22165064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Trams, trains, planes and automobiles: logistics of conducting a statewide audit of medical records.
Flood M; Pollock W; McDonald S; Davey MA
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2016 Oct; 40(5):448-450. PubMed ID: 27198561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are unaudited records from an outcomes registry database accurate?
Herbert MA; Prince SL; Williams JL; Magee MJ; Mack MJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 77(6):1960-4; discussion 1964-5. PubMed ID: 15172246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgeons' Responses to a Surgical Mortality Audit: Accepting and Improving: A Cross Sectional Survey.
Fraser B; Rey-Conde T; Allen J; North JB
J Surg Res; 2021 Oct; 266():306-310. PubMed ID: 34044174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perioperative mortality in Zambia.
Heywood AJ; Wilson IH; Sinclair JR
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1989 Nov; 71(6):354-8. PubMed ID: 2604342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Dutch surgical colorectal audit.
Van Leersum NJ; Snijders HS; Henneman D; Kolfschoten NE; Gooiker GA; ten Berge MG; Eddes EH; Wouters MW; Tollenaar RA; ; Bemelman WA; van Dam RM; Elferink MA; Karsten TM; van Krieken JH; Lemmens VE; Rutten HJ; Manusama ER; van de Velde CJ; Meijerink WJ; Wiggers T; van der Harst E; Dekker JW; Boerma D
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1063-70. PubMed ID: 23871573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Shiloach M; Frencher SK; Steeger JE; Rowell KS; Bartzokis K; Tomeh MG; Richards KE; Ko CY; Hall BL
J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Jan; 210(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 20123325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the CRABEL Score for improving surgical case-note quality.
Ho MY; Anderson AR; Nijjar A; Thomas C; Goenka A; Hossain J; Curley PJ
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Nov; 87(6):454-7. PubMed ID: 16263017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Post-mortem general surgeon reflection on decision-making: a mixed-methods study of mortality audit data.
Cattanach DE; Wysocki AP; Ray-Conde T; Nankivell C; Allen J; North JB
ANZ J Surg; 2018 Oct; 88(10):993-997. PubMed ID: 30159977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
