These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26687041)
1. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Study of inter-software accuracy and reproducibility using simulated and clinical data. Beuzit L; Eliat PA; Brun V; Ferré JC; Gandon Y; Bannier E; Saint-Jalmes H J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1288-300. PubMed ID: 26687041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Part I. Perfusion characteristics in the female pelvis by using multiple computer-aided diagnosis perfusion analysis solutions. Heye T; Davenport MS; Horvath JJ; Feuerlein S; Breault SR; Bashir MR; Merkle EM; Boll DT Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):801-11. PubMed ID: 23220897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of pelvic and lumbar bone marrow: effect of age and marrow fat content on pharmacokinetic parameter values. Breault SR; Heye T; Bashir MR; Dale BM; Merkle EM; Reiner CS; Faridi KF; Gupta RT AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):W297-303. PubMed ID: 23436875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inter- and intra-rater reproducibility of quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using TWIST perfusion data in a uterine fibroid model. Davenport MS; Heye T; Dale BM; Horvath JJ; Breault SR; Feuerlein S; Bashir MR; Boll DT; Merkle EM J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Aug; 38(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 23239041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of precontrast T10 relaxation times on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI pharmacokinetic parameters: T10 mapping versus a fixed T10 reference value. Heye T; Boll DT; Reiner CS; Bashir MR; Dale BM; Merkle EM J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 39(5):1136-45. PubMed ID: 25006630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameter estimation on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate: Preliminary evaluation of a novel AIF-free estimation method. Ginsburg SB; Taimen P; Merisaari H; Vainio P; Boström PJ; Aronen HJ; Jambor I; Madabhushi A J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Dec; 44(6):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 27285161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of liver fibrosis using pharmacokinetic parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Li Z; Sun J; Chen L; Huang N; Hu P; Hu X; Han G; Zhou Y; Bai W; Niu T; Yang X J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 44(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 26707910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of two-compartment-exchange-model analysis for dynamic contrast-enhanced mri incorporating bolus arrival time. Nadav G; Liberman G; Artzi M; Kiryati N; Bashat DB J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jan; 45(1):237-249. PubMed ID: 27383624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation Between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters in Rectal Cancer. Sun H; Xu Y; Xu Q; Duan J; Zhang H; Liu T; Li L; Chan Q; Xie S; Wang W Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):e134-e140. PubMed ID: 30268719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimized Fast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: Effect of Sampling Duration on Pharmacokinetic Parameters. Othman AE; Falkner F; Martirosian P; Schraml C; Schwentner C; Nickel D; Nikolaou K; Notohamiprodjo M Invest Radiol; 2016 Feb; 51(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 26447494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic contrast-enhanced case-control analysis in 3T MRI of prostate cancer can help to characterize tumor aggressiveness. Sanz-Requena R; Martí-Bonmatí L; Pérez-Martínez R; García-Martí G Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2119-2126. PubMed ID: 27776667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer at 3 T: a study of pharmacokinetic parameters. Ocak I; Bernardo M; Metzger G; Barrett T; Pinto P; Albert PS; Choyke PL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):849. PubMed ID: 17885055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cluster analysis of DCE-MRI data identifies regional tracer-kinetic changes after tumor treatment with high intensity focused ultrasound. Jacobs I; Hectors SJ; Schabel MC; Grüll H; Strijkers GJ; Nicolay K NMR Biomed; 2015 Nov; 28(11):1443-54. PubMed ID: 26390040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tumoral and nontumoral pancreas: correlation between quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and histopathologic parameters. Bali MA; Metens T; Denolin V; Delhaye M; Demetter P; Closset J; Matos C Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):456-66. PubMed ID: 21852570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Solid pancreatic lesions: characterization by using timing bolus dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging assessment--a preliminary study. Kim JH; Lee JM; Park JH; Kim SC; Joo I; Han JK; Choi BI Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):185-96. PubMed ID: 23192779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semiautomatic determination of arterial input functions for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Chung J; Kim JH; Lee EJ; Kim YN; Yi CA Invest Radiol; 2015 Mar; 50(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 25369854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimization of saturation-recovery dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI acquisition protocol: monte carlo simulation approach demonstrated with gadolinium MR renography. Zhang JL; Conlin CC; Carlston K; Xie L; Kim D; Morrell G; Morton K; Lee VS NMR Biomed; 2016 Jul; 29(7):969-77. PubMed ID: 27200499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI in the study of brain gliomas: a comparison of data obtained using different commercial software. Conte GM; Castellano A; Altabella L; Iadanza A; Cadioli M; Falini A; Anzalone N Radiol Med; 2017 Apr; 122(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 28070841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraindividual in vivo comparison of gadolinium contrast agents for pharmacokinetic analysis using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Liang J; Sammet S; Yang X; Jia G; Takayama Y; Knopp MV Invest Radiol; 2010 May; 45(5):233-44. PubMed ID: 20351653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for mouse models using automatic detection of the arterial input function. Kim JH; Im GH; Yang J; Choi D; Lee WJ; Lee JH NMR Biomed; 2012 Apr; 25(4):674-84. PubMed ID: 21954069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]