BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

775 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26687140)

  • 1. Embedded Three-Layer Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Morbidity and Improves Short-Term Outcomes After Esophagectomy for Cancer.
    Sun HB; Li Y; Liu XB; Zhang RX; Wang ZF; Zheng Y; Qin JJ; Li HM; Chen XK; Wu Z
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1131-8. PubMed ID: 26687140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
    Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
    Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leaks after transhiatal esophagectomy: risk factors, presentation, and detection.
    Cooke DT; Lin GC; Lau CL; Zhang L; Si MS; Lee J; Chang AC; Pickens A; Orringer MB
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 88(1):177-84; discussion 184-5. PubMed ID: 19559221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
    Luechakiettisak P; Kasetsunthorn S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 May; 91(5):681-5. PubMed ID: 18672632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
    Nederlof N; Tilanus HW; Tran TC; Hop WC; Wijnhoven BP; de Jonge J
    Ann Surg; 2011 Aug; 254(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 21725230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
    Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
    J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of thoracic and cervical anastomoses.
    Blewett CJ; Miller JD; Young JE; Bennett WF; Urschel JD
    Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Apr; 7(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 11371275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
    Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
    World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis.
    Blackmon SH; Correa AM; Wynn B; Hofstetter WL; Martin LW; Mehran RJ; Rice DC; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Roth JA; Vaporciyan AA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 May; 83(5):1805-13; discussion 1813. PubMed ID: 17462404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Tsuji T; Ojima T; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Katsuda M; Hayata K; Kitadani J; Maruoka S; Shimokawa T; Yamaue H
    Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 30691515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pre-embedded cervical circular stapled anastomosis in esophagectomy.
    Li J; Wang B; Liang T; Guo NN; Zhao M
    Thorac Cancer; 2020 Mar; 11(3):723-727. PubMed ID: 32017456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparative analysis of mechanical and manual cervical esophagogastric anastomosis following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
    Cayi R; Li M; Xiong G; Cai K; Wang W
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Jun; 32(6):908-9. PubMed ID: 22699083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer?
    Ercan S; Rice TW; Murthy SC; Rybicki LA; Blackstone EH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Mar; 129(3):623-31. PubMed ID: 15746747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
    Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. End-to-End Versus End-to-Side Hand-Sewn Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy.
    Mao CY; Yang YS; Yuan Y; Hu WP; Zhao YF; Hu Y; Che GW; Chen LQ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Nov; 26(12):4062-4069. PubMed ID: 31313034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of cervical delta-shaped anastomosis and circular stapled anastomosis after esophagectomy.
    Huang C; Xu X; Zhuang B; Chen W; Xu X; Wang C; Lin S
    World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jan; 15(1):31. PubMed ID: 28103879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques.
    Santos RS; Raftopoulos Y; Singh D; DeHoyos A; Fernando HC; Keenan RJ; Luketich JD; Landreneau RJ
    Surgery; 2004 Oct; 136(4):917-25. PubMed ID: 15467679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
    Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
    Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anastomotic Techniques and Associated Morbidity in Total Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Results From the EsoBenchmark Database.
    Schröder W; Raptis DA; Schmidt HM; Gisbertz SS; Moons J; Asti E; Luyer MDP; Hölscher AH; Schneider PM; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Nafteux P; Nilsson M; Räsanen J; Palazzo F; Mercer S; Bonavina L; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Wijjnhoven BPL; Pattyn P; Grimminger PP; Bruns CJ; Gutschow CA
    Ann Surg; 2019 Nov; 270(5):820-826. PubMed ID: 31634181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.