These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26687931)

  • 1. The intelligent anatomy spotter: A new approach to incorporate higher levels of Bloom's taxonomy.
    Choudhury B; Gouldsborough I; Shaw FL
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Oct; 9(5):440-5. PubMed ID: 26687931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of comprehension on performance at higher levels of Bloom's taxonomy: Findings from assessments of healthcare professional students.
    Verenna AA; Noble KA; Pearson HE; Miller SM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Sep; 11(5):433-444. PubMed ID: 29346708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring the impact of the flipped anatomy classroom: The importance of categorizing an assessment by Bloom's taxonomy.
    Morton DA; Colbert-Getz JM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 27427860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The integrated anatomy practical paper: A robust assessment method for anatomy education today.
    Smith CF; McManus B
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 24706567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of anatomical knowledge by practical examinations: The effect of question design on student performance.
    Sagoo MG; Smith CF; Gosden E
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Oct; 9(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 26840187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Climbing Bloom's taxonomy pyramid: Lessons from a graduate histology course.
    Zaidi NB; Hwang C; Scott S; Stallard S; Purkiss J; Hortsch M
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Sep; 10(5):456-464. PubMed ID: 28231408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrospective analysis of prevalent anatomy spotter's examination: an educational audit.
    Tirpude AP; Gaikwad M; Tirpude PA; Jain M; Bora S
    Korean J Med Educ; 2019 Jun; 31(2):115-124. PubMed ID: 31230434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of testing with multiple choice versus open-ended questions: Outcome-based observations in an anatomy course.
    Melovitz Vasan CA; DeFouw DO; Holland BK; Vasan NS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 May; 11(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 28941215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The validity of multiple choice practical examinations as an alternative to traditional free response examination formats in gross anatomy.
    Shaibah HS; van der Vleuten CP
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 23109285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Blooming Anatomy Tool (BAT): A discipline-specific rubric for utilizing Bloom's taxonomy in the design and evaluation of assessments in the anatomical sciences.
    Thompson AR; O'Loughlin VD
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(6):493-501. PubMed ID: 25516150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Summative and Formative Style Anatomy Practical Examinations: Do They Have Impact on Students' Performance and Drive for Learning?
    Mogali SR; Rotgans JI; Rosby L; Ferenczi MA; Low Beer N
    Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Sep; 13(5):581-590. PubMed ID: 31733172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of images on item statistics in multiple choice anatomy examinations.
    Notebaert AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 27472765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of image quality, repeated study, and assessment method on anatomy learning.
    Fenesi B; Mackinnon C; Cheng L; Kim JA; Wainman BC
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jun; 10(3):249-261. PubMed ID: 27764531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spot(ters) the difference: Bringing traditional anatomical examinations online.
    Bond AP; Butts T; Tierney CM
    Clin Anat; 2024 Apr; 37(3):284-293. PubMed ID: 37409502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple-Choice versus Open-Ended Questions in Advanced Clinical Neuroanatomy: Using a National Neuroanatomy Assessment to Investigate Variability in Performance Using Different Question Types.
    Merzougui WH; Myers MA; Hall S; Elmansouri A; Parker R; Robson AD; Kurn O; Parrott R; Geoghegan K; Harrison CH; Anbu D; Dean O; Border S
    Anat Sci Educ; 2021 May; 14(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 33420758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial abilities and anatomy knowledge assessment: A systematic review.
    Langlois J; Bellemare C; Toulouse J; Wells GA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jun; 10(3):235-241. PubMed ID: 27731946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of traditional versus three-dimensional augmented curriculum on anatomical learning outcome measures.
    Peterson DC; Mlynarczyk GS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 27078503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Online dissection audio-visual resources for human anatomy: Undergraduate medical students' usage and learning outcomes.
    Choi-Lundberg DL; Cuellar WA; Williams AM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):545-554. PubMed ID: 27802370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality.
    Meyer AJ; Innes SI; Stomski NJ; Armson AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 25981194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Practical session assessments in human anatomy: Weightings and performance.
    McDonald AC; Chan SP; Schuijers JA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Jul; 9(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 26580309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.