166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26688065)
1. Gift from statistical learning: Visual statistical learning enhances memory for sequence elements and impairs memory for items that disrupt regularities.
Otsuka S; Saiki J
Cognition; 2016 Feb; 147():113-26. PubMed ID: 26688065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual statistical learning based on the perceptual and semantic information of objects.
Otsuka S; Nishiyama M; Nakahara F; Kawaguchi J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):196-207. PubMed ID: 22686848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The roles of order, distance, and interstitial items in temporal visual statistical learning.
Park SH; Rogers LL; Vickery TJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1409-1419. PubMed ID: 29956264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual statistical learning at basic and subordinate category levels in real-world images.
Jun J; Chong SC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):1946-1961. PubMed ID: 30014318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distinct contributions of attention and working memory to visual statistical learning and ensemble processing.
Hall MG; Mattingley JB; Dux PE
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1112-23. PubMed ID: 26010589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual statistical learning is not reliably modulated by selective attention to isolated events.
Musz E; Weber MJ; Thompson-Schill SL
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):78-96. PubMed ID: 25172196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lingering effects of inattention on the recognition of novel forms.
Becker DV
Memory; 2009 Aug; 17(6):687-94. PubMed ID: 19585347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Congruency effects on recognition memory: a context effect.
Rosner TM; Milliken B
Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Jun; 69(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 25774995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automaticity of basic-level categorization accounts for labeling effects in visual recognition memory.
Richler JJ; Gauthier I; Palmeri TJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1579-87. PubMed ID: 21767063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Generalization from episodic memories across time: a route for semantic knowledge acquisition.
Sweegers CC; Talamini LM
Cortex; 2014 Oct; 59():49-61. PubMed ID: 25129237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Human visual system automatically encodes sequential regularities of discrete events.
Kimura M; Schröger E; Czigler I; Ohira H
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1124-39. PubMed ID: 19583466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The context repetition effect: predicted events are remembered better, even when they don't happen.
Smith TA; Hasinski AE; Sederberg PB
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Nov; 142(4):1298-308. PubMed ID: 23957285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Searching for the right word: Hybrid visual and memory search for words.
Boettcher SE; Wolfe JM
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1132-42. PubMed ID: 25788035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hebb repetition effects for non-verbal visual sequences: determinants of sequence acquisition.
Johnson AJ; Dygacz A; Miles C
Memory; 2017 Oct; 25(9):1279-1293. PubMed ID: 28276975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preserved capacity for learning statistical regularities and directing selective attention after hippocampal lesions.
Rungratsameetaweemana N; Squire LR; Serences JT
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Sep; 116(39):19705-19710. PubMed ID: 31492814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is a search template an ordinary working memory? Comparing electrophysiological markers of working memory maintenance for visual search and recognition.
Gunseli E; Meeter M; Olivers CN
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jul; 60():29-38. PubMed ID: 24878275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistical learning is constrained to less abstract patterns in complex sensory input (but not the least).
Emberson LL; Rubinstein DY
Cognition; 2016 Aug; 153():63-78. PubMed ID: 27139779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Meet The Simpsons: top-down effects in face learning.
Bonner L; Burton AM; Jenkins R; McNeill A; Vicki B
Perception; 2003; 32(10):1159-68. PubMed ID: 14700251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual Perceptual Echo Reflects Learning of Regularities in Rapid Luminance Sequences.
Chang AY; Schwartzman DJ; VanRullen R; Kanai R; Seth AK
J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(35):8486-8497. PubMed ID: 28765331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
