These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26688116)

  • 21. From local to global changes in proteins: a network view.
    Vuillon L; Lesieur C
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2015 Apr; 31():1-8. PubMed ID: 25791607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Protein promiscuity: drug resistance and native functions--HIV-1 case.
    Fernández A; Tawfik DS; Berkhout B; Sanders R; Kloczkowski A; Sen T; Jernigan B
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2005 Jun; 22(6):615-24. PubMed ID: 15842167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Why are proteins so robust to site mutations?
    Taverna DM; Goldstein RA
    J Mol Biol; 2002 Jan; 315(3):479-84. PubMed ID: 11786027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Characterization of compensated mutations in terms of structural and physico-chemical properties.
    Ferrer-Costa C; Orozco M; de la Cruz X
    J Mol Biol; 2007 Jan; 365(1):249-56. PubMed ID: 17059831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A nonadaptive origin of a beneficial trait: in silico selection for free energy of folding leads to the neutral emergence of mutational robustness in single domain proteins.
    Pagan RF; Massey SE
    J Mol Evol; 2014 Feb; 78(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 24362542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accurate prediction for atomic-level protein design and its application in diversifying the near-optimal sequence space.
    Fromer M; Yanover C
    Proteins; 2009 May; 75(3):682-705. PubMed ID: 19003998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How mutational epistasis impairs predictability in protein evolution and design.
    Miton CM; Tokuriki N
    Protein Sci; 2016 Jul; 25(7):1260-72. PubMed ID: 26757214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Physical origins of protein superfamilies.
    Zeldovich KB; Berezovsky IN; Shakhnovich EI
    J Mol Biol; 2006 Apr; 357(4):1335-43. PubMed ID: 16483605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determination of network of residues that regulate allostery in protein families using sequence analysis.
    Dima RI; Thirumalai D
    Protein Sci; 2006 Feb; 15(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 16434743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Application of information theory to a three-body coarse-grained representation of proteins in the PDB: insights into the structural and evolutionary roles of residues in protein structure.
    Thompson JJ; Tabatabaei Ghomi H; Lill MA
    Proteins; 2014 Dec; 82(12):3450-65. PubMed ID: 25269778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On residues in the disallowed region of the Ramachandran map.
    Pal D; Chakrabarti P
    Biopolymers; 2002 Mar; 63(3):195-206. PubMed ID: 11787007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Emergence of highly designable protein-backbone conformations in an off-lattice model.
    Miller J; Zeng C; Wingreen NS; Tang C
    Proteins; 2002 Jun; 47(4):506-12. PubMed ID: 12001229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long-Range Epistasis Mediated by Structural Change in a Model of Ligand Binding Proteins.
    Nelson ED; Grishin NV
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166739. PubMed ID: 27870911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Structural and physico-chemical effects of disease and non-disease nsSNPs on proteins.
    Kucukkal TG; Petukh M; Li L; Alexov E
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2015 Jun; 32():18-24. PubMed ID: 25658850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Modeling the mutational effects on calmodulin structure: prediction of alteration in the amino acid interactions.
    Rashid A; Khurshid R; Begum M; Gul-e-Raana ; Latif M; Salim A
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2004 Apr; 317(2):363-9. PubMed ID: 15063766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Computational modeling of protein mutant stability: analysis and optimization of statistical potentials and structural features reveal insights into prediction model development.
    Parthiban V; Gromiha MM; Abhinandan M; Schomburg D
    BMC Struct Biol; 2007 Aug; 7():54. PubMed ID: 17705837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of secondary structural and physicochemical changes in protein-protein complexes.
    Saranya N; Saravanan KM; Michael Gromiha M; Selvaraj S
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2016; 34(3):508-16. PubMed ID: 25990569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Compensatory mutations and epistasis for protein function.
    Storz JF
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2018 Jun; 50():18-25. PubMed ID: 29100081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A tale of two tails: why are terminal residues of proteins exposed?
    Jacob E; Unger R
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):e225-30. PubMed ID: 17237096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Current updates on computer aided protein modeling and designing.
    Khan FI; Wei DQ; Gu KR; Hassan MI; Tabrez S
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2016 Apr; 85():48-62. PubMed ID: 26730484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.