123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26688853)
1. The orthogonal-oblique bi-level model of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2): Polish adaptation based on factor analysis.
Simon W; Śliwka P; Sobański JA; Klasa K; Sala P; Żak W; Busath G; Lambert MJ
Psychiatr Pol; 2015; 49(5):1043-70. PubMed ID: 26688853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Portuguese version of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45): Normative data, reliability, and clinical significance cut-offs scores.
Machado PP; Fassnacht DB
Psychol Psychother; 2015 Dec; 88(4):427-37. PubMed ID: 25484181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The outcome questionnaire 45.2. Italian validation of an instrument for the assessment of psychological treatments].
Chiappelli M; Lo Coco G; Gullo S; Bensi L; Prestano C
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc; 2008; 17(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 18589632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the Hebrew and Arabic Versions of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45).
Gross R; Glasser S; Elisha D; Tishby O; Madar Jacobson D; Levitan G; Lambert MJ; Ponizovsky AM
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2015; 52(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 25841108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychometric properties of the outcome questionnaire-45.2: the Norwegian version in an international context.
Amble I; Gude T; Stubdal S; Oktedalen T; Skjorten AM; Andersen BJ; Solbakken OA; Brorson HH; Arnevik E; Lambert MJ; Wampold BE
Psychother Res; 2014; 24(4):504-13. PubMed ID: 24188797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and validity of the youth outcome questionnaire self-report.
Ridge NW; Warren JS; Burlingame GM; Wells MG; Tumblin KM
J Clin Psychol; 2009 Oct; 65(10):1115-26. PubMed ID: 19693961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Translation of the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ) into Japanese: A cultural adaptation.
Takara R; Beecher ME; Okiishi JC; Shimokawa K; Lambert MJ; Griner D
Psychother Res; 2017 Mar; 27(2):154-166. PubMed ID: 26360667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the Responsiveness to Therapeutic Change with Routine Outcome Monitoring: A Comparison of the Symptom Questionnaire-48 (SQ-48) with the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45).
Carlier IV; Kovács V; van Noorden MS; van der Feltz-Cornelis C; Mooij N; Schulte-van Maaren YW; van Hemert AM; Zitman FG; Giltay EJ
Clin Psychol Psychother; 2017 Jan; 24(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 26450457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cut-off Scores and Clinical Change Indices for the Dutch Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45) in a Large Sample of Normal and Several Psychotherapeutic Populations.
Timman R; de Jong K; de Neve-Enthoven N
Clin Psychol Psychother; 2017 Jan; 24(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 26497324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The factorial structure of the Outcome Questionnaire-45: a study with an Italian sample.
Lo Coco G; Chiappelli M; Bensi L; Gullo S; Prestano C; Lambert MJ
Clin Psychol Psychother; 2008; 15(6):418-23. PubMed ID: 19115460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability and validity of the Outcome Questionnaire-45.2.
Boswell DL; White JK; Sims WD; Harrist RS; Romans JS
Psychol Rep; 2013 Jun; 112(3):689-93. PubMed ID: 24245064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measuring patient distress in primary care.
Seelert KR; Hill RD; Rigdon MA; Schwenzfeier E
Fam Med; 1999; 31(7):483-7. PubMed ID: 10425529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spanish Adaptation and Validation of the Outcome Questionnaire OQ-30.2.
Errázuriz P; Opazo S; Behn A; Silva O; Gloger S
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():673. PubMed ID: 28559857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The clinical psychological diagnostic system (KPD-38): sensitivity to change and validity of a self-report instrument for outcome monitoring and quality assurance.
Moessner M; Gallas C; Haug S; Kordy H
Clin Psychol Psychother; 2011; 18(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 20812367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the Polish version of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) using differential item functioning (DIF) analysis.
Czachowski S; Terluin B; Izdebski A; Izdebski P
Fam Pract; 2012 Oct; 29(5):609-15. PubMed ID: 22362869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An examination of the "interpersonalness" of the outcome questionnaire.
Hess TR; Rohlfing JE; Hardy AO; Glidden-Tracey C; Tracey TJ
Assessment; 2010 Sep; 17(3):396-9. PubMed ID: 20484712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Validation of two measuring instruments for routine outcome monitoring in psychiatry: the HORVAN study].
Buwalda VJ; Draisma S; Smit JH; Swinkels J; van Tilburg W
Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2011; 53(10):715-26. PubMed ID: 21989750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The individual therapy process questionnaire: development and validation of a revised measure to evaluate general change mechanisms in psychotherapy.
Mander J
Clin Psychol Psychother; 2015; 22(4):328-45. PubMed ID: 24604874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptoms.
Yazici Güleç M; Güleç H; Simşek G; Turhan M; Aydin Sünbül E
Compr Psychiatry; 2012 Jul; 53(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 22000476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trauma Related Guilt Inventory - psychometric properties of the Polish adaptation (TRGI-PL).
Popiel A; Zawadzki B
Psychiatr Pol; 2015; 49(5):1089-99. PubMed ID: 26688855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
