BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26689648)

  • 1. An analytical comparison between point-of-care uric acid testing meters.
    Paraskos J; Berke Z; Cook J; Miner JN; Braddock M; Platt A; Hughes G
    Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2016; 16(3):373-82. PubMed ID: 26689648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of the HumaSens
    Fabre S; Clerson P; Launay JM; Gautier JF; Vidal-Trecan T; Riveline JP; Platt A; Abrahamsson A; Miner JN; Hughes G; Richette P; Bardin T
    Arthritis Res Ther; 2018 May; 20(1):78. PubMed ID: 29720236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Portable electrochemical blood uric acid meter.
    Kuo CS; Hwu CM; Lin YH; Huang YH; Kao WY; Weih MJ; Hsiao LC; Kwok CF; Ho LT
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2002; 16(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 11948801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of serum uric acid using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)/isotope dilution mass spectrometry (ID-MS) as a candidate reference method.
    Dai X; Fang X; Zhang C; Xu R; Xu B
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2007 Oct; 857(2):287-95. PubMed ID: 17704012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Method Comparison and Bias Estimation of Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), Creatinine (Cr), and Uric Acid (UA) Measurements between Two Analytical Methods.
    Cai A; Qi S; Su Z; Yang Y; Shen H; Wang T; Dai Y
    Clin Lab; 2017 Jan; 63(1):73-77. PubMed ID: 28164498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a new point-of-care testing system for measuring white blood cell and C-reactive protein levels in whole blood samples.
    Kotani K; Minami T; Abe T; Sato J; Taniguchi N; Yamada T
    Clin Chim Acta; 2014 Jun; 433():145-9. PubMed ID: 24642344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. User competency is still a major factor affecting analytical performance of glucose meters in patient service.
    Huang Y; Campbell E; Colbourne B; Power J; Randell E
    Clin Biochem; 2019 Jan; 63():66-71. PubMed ID: 30508517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analytical performance of three whole blood point-of-care lactate devices compared to plasma lactate comparison methods and a flow-injection mass spectrometry method.
    Tolan NV; Wockenfus AM; Koch CD; Crews BO; Dietzen DJ; Karon BS
    Clin Biochem; 2017 Mar; 50(4-5):168-173. PubMed ID: 27836621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lactate POCT in mobile intensive care units for septic patients? A comparison of capillary blood method versus venous blood and plasma-based reference methods.
    Léguillier T; Jouffroy R; Boisson M; Boussaroque A; Chenevier-Gobeaux C; Chaabouni T; Vivien B; Nivet-Antoine V; Beaudeux JL
    Clin Biochem; 2018 May; 55():9-14. PubMed ID: 29522709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of error grid analysis to evaluate acceptability of a point of care prothrombin time meter.
    Petersen JR; Vonmarensdorf HM; Weiss HL; Elghetany MT
    Clin Chim Acta; 2010 Feb; 411(3-4):131-4. PubMed ID: 19913526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of a new interference-resistant glucose meter.
    Vanavanan S; Santanirand P; Chaichanajarernkul U; Chittamma A; Dubois JA; Shirey T; Heinz M
    Clin Biochem; 2010 Jan; 43(1-2):186-92. PubMed ID: 19769953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring statistical agreement between four point of care (POC) lactate meters and a laboratory blood analyzer in cats.
    Acierno MJ; Johnson ME; Eddleman LA; Mitchell MA
    J Feline Med Surg; 2008 Apr; 10(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 17904887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the accuracy of two point-of-care haemoglobin meters used in sub-Saharan African population: a cross-sectional study.
    Choukem SP; Sih C; Ntumsi AT; Dimala CA; Mboue-Djieka Y; Ngouadjeu EDT; Kengne AP
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2020 Mar; 20(1):111. PubMed ID: 32138653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SKML-Quality Mark for point-of-care test (POCT) glucose meters and glucose meters for home-use.
    Jansen RT; Slingerland RJ
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Jul; 48(7):1021-7. PubMed ID: 20459353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation of clinical accuracy of the EasyTouch blood uric acid self-monitoring system.
    Dai KS; Tai DY; Ho P; Chen CC; Peng WC; Chen ST; Hsu CC; Liu YP; Hsieh HC; Mao SJ
    Clin Biochem; 2005 Mar; 38(3):278-81. PubMed ID: 15708551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An amperometric uric acid biosensor based on modified Ir-C electrode.
    Luo YC; Do JS; Liu CC
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2006 Oct; 22(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 16908130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of four point-of-care meters for rapid determination of blood lactate concentrations in dogs.
    Acierno MJ; Mitchell MA
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2007 May; 230(9):1315-8. PubMed ID: 17472555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can one point-of-care glucose meter be used for all pediatric and adult hospital patients? Evaluation of three meters, including recently modified test strips.
    Warner JV; Wu JY; Buckingham N; McLeod DS; Mottram B; Carter AC
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2011 Jan; 13(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 21175272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Accuracy Guidelines for Hospital Glucose Meters.
    Bowman CF; Nichols JH
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 May; 14(3):546-552. PubMed ID: 31983225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance evaluation of blood glucose monitoring devices.
    Chen ET; Nichols JH; Duh SH; Hortin G
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2003; 5(5):749-68. PubMed ID: 14633341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.