These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26690631)

  • 1. Dental protection with a padded laryngoscope flange.
    Pysyk CL
    Can J Anaesth; 2016 May; 63(5):641-2. PubMed ID: 26690631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effective dental protection during rigid endoscopy.
    Domanski M; Lee P; Sadeghi N
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Dec; 121(12):2590-1. PubMed ID: 22109757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Videolaryngoscopy could decrease claims associated with dental injury.
    Lee JM
    J Clin Anesth; 2018 Jun; 47():64. PubMed ID: 29587207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Warning devices for prevention of dental injury during laryngoscopy. Preliminary report.
    Ho AM; Hewitt G
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2000; 16(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 12578074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of Trachway® video stylet use on perioperative dental injury: A retrospective study.
    Hung KC; Sun CK; Shih YH; Chang YJ; Kuo CY; Chen JY; Chu CC
    J Clin Anesth; 2020 Feb; 59():36-37. PubMed ID: 31203110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In reference to Cost-effective dental protection during rigid endoscopy.
    Hoffman H; Bayan S; Tokita J; Van Daele D; Schneider R
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Oct; 122(10):2362; author reply 2363. PubMed ID: 22865602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Universal dental protection device!
    Kumar GV; Dutta A; Sood J
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 Sep; 50(8):1037-8. PubMed ID: 16923103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of McGrath and Macintosh laryngoscopes in novice users: a manikin study.
    Ray DC; Billington C; Kearns PK; Kirkbride R; Mackintosh K; Reeve CS; Robinson N; Stewart CJ; Trudeau T
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Nov; 64(11):1207-10. PubMed ID: 19825056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Determination of the distance between the upper incisors and the laryngoscope blade during laryngoscopy: comparisons of the McCoy, the Macintosh, the Miller, and the Belscope blades].
    Bito H; Nishiyama T; Higarhizawa T; Sakai T; Konishi A
    Masui; 1998 Oct; 47(10):1257-61. PubMed ID: 9834604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Callender modification of the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces the risk of tooth-blade contact in children.
    Mireskandari SM; Askarizadeh N; Darabi ME; Rahimi E; Ataee HA; Chamrami F; Eghtesadi-Araghi P
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Nov; 18(11):1035-9. PubMed ID: 18950325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective model-based comparison of different laryngoscopes for difficult intubation in infants.
    Kalbhenn J; Boelke AK; Steinmann D
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Aug; 22(8):776-80. PubMed ID: 22646973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Callander laryngoscope blade modification is associated with a decreased risk of dental contact.
    Lee J; Choi JH; Lee YK; Kim ES; Kwon OK; Hastings RH
    Can J Anaesth; 2004 Feb; 51(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 14766698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shelf life of rechargeable laryngoscope batteries without recharging.
    Milne AD; Brousseau PA
    Can J Anaesth; 2012 Sep; 59(9):913-4. PubMed ID: 22644431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.
    Su YC; Chen CC; Lee YK; Lee JY; Lin KJ
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Nov; 28(11):788-95. PubMed ID: 21897263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of wooden tongue spatula for teeth protection during endotracheal intubation: a new concept.
    Pipelzadeh MR; Khan ZH; Nassajian N; Olapoor A; Javaherforoosh F; Assareh F; Rasouli MR
    J Clin Anesth; 2008 Sep; 20(6):481-2. PubMed ID: 18929297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laryngoscope modification to avoid perioral trauma due to laryngoscopy.
    Nique TA; Bennett CR; Altop H
    Anesth Prog; 1982; 29(2):47-9. PubMed ID: 6130727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rescue microlaryngoscopy: a protocol for utilization of four techniques in overcoming challenging exposures in microlaryngeal surgery.
    Cheng J; Woo P
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):590-5. PubMed ID: 22578436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Bullard and Airtraq laryngoscopes with conventional laryngoscopy in a manikin study of simulated difficult intubation.
    Legrand MA; Steinmann D; Priebe HJ; Mols G
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Jul; 29(7):343-50. PubMed ID: 22569030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel technique using the gum elastic bougie and video laryngoscope for intubation in an unanticipated difficult airway.
    Hand WR; Sutton BM
    J Clin Anesth; 2012 Dec; 24(8):675-7. PubMed ID: 23228873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Smartphone assisted laryngoscopy: a new technique to overcome light failure in a laryngoscope.
    Avidan A; Shaylor R; Levin PD
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Nov; 117(5):1262-3. PubMed ID: 24149509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.