These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26691160)

  • 1. Excitation Patterns of Standard and Steered Partial Tripolar Stimuli in Cochlear Implants.
    Wu CC; Luo X
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 17(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 26691160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Symmetric Electrode Spanning Narrows the Excitation Patterns of Partial Tripolar Stimuli in Cochlear Implants.
    Luo X; Wu CC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 17(6):609-619. PubMed ID: 27562804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current steering with partial tripolar stimulation mode in cochlear implants.
    Wu CC; Luo X
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Apr; 14(2):213-31. PubMed ID: 23250685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrode spanning with partial tripolar stimulation mode in cochlear implants.
    Wu CC; Luo X
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Dec; 15(6):1023-36. PubMed ID: 24865767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML; Stille LJ
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):435-52. PubMed ID: 18344869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of stimulus and recording parameters on spatial spread of excitation and masking patterns obtained with the electrically evoked compound action potential in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML; Stille LJ
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):679-92. PubMed ID: 20505513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic current steering with phantom electrode in cochlear implants.
    Luo X; Garrett C
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107949. PubMed ID: 32200300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pitch ranking, electrode discrimination, and physiological spread of excitation using current steering in cochlear implants.
    Goehring JL; Neff DL; Baudhuin JL; Hughes ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3159. PubMed ID: 25480063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
    Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relation between electrophysiologic channel interaction and electrode pitch ranking in cochlear implant recipients.
    Hughes ML; Abbas PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1527-37. PubMed ID: 16583898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduction in spread of excitation from current focusing at multiple cochlear locations in cochlear implant users.
    Padilla M; Landsberger DM
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():98-107. PubMed ID: 26778546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pitch ranking, electrode discrimination, and physiological spread-of-excitation using Cochlear's dual-electrode mode.
    Goehring JL; Neff DL; Baudhuin JL; Hughes ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):715-27. PubMed ID: 25096106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Loudness and pitch perception using Dynamically Compensated Virtual Channels.
    Nogueira W; Litvak LM; Landsberger DM; Büchner A
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():223-234. PubMed ID: 27939418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrically evoked compound action potential measures for virtual channels versus physical electrodes.
    Hughes ML; Goulson AM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 21187752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays.
    Hughes ML; Abbas PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1538-47. PubMed ID: 16583899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A re-evaluation of the relation between physiological channel interaction and electrode pitch ranking in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):2711-4. PubMed ID: 19045758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial spread of neural excitation: comparison of compound action potential and forward-masking data in cochlear implant recipients.
    Cohen LT; Saunders E; Richardson LM
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 43(6):346-55. PubMed ID: 15457817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.
    Bierer JA; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 20090533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
    van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.