BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26691222)

  • 1. Prognostic impact of debulking surgery and residual tumor in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer FIGO stage IV.
    Ataseven B; Grimm C; Harter P; Heitz F; Traut A; Prader S; du Bois A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Feb; 140(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 26691222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efforts at maximal cytoreduction improve survival in ovarian cancer patients, even when complete gross resection is not feasible.
    Wallace S; Kumar A; Mc Gree M; Weaver A; Mariani A; Langstraat C; Dowdy S; Bakkum-Gamez J; Cliby W
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 145(1):21-26. PubMed ID: 28159407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Histopathology predicts clinical outcome in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and debulking surgery.
    Muraji M; Sudo T; Iwasaki S; Ueno S; Wakahashi S; Yamaguchi S; Fujiwara K; Nishimura R
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Dec; 131(3):531-4. PubMed ID: 24096109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles prior to interval surgery in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Colombo PE; Labaki M; Fabbro M; Bertrand M; Mourregot A; Gutowski M; Saint-Aubert B; Quenet F; Rouanet P; Mollevi C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Nov; 135(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 25220627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prognostic value of residual tumor size in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer FIGO stages IIA-IV: analysis of the OVCAD data.
    Polterauer S; Vergote I; Concin N; Braicu I; Chekerov R; Mahner S; Woelber L; Cadron I; Van Gorp T; Zeillinger R; Castillo-Tong DC; Sehouli J
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Mar; 22(3):380-5. PubMed ID: 22266934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Centralisation of epithelial ovarian cancer surgery: results on survival from a peripheral teaching hospital.
    van Vliet MM; Schreuder HW; Pasker-de Jong PC; Duk MJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Sep; 192():72-8. PubMed ID: 26177496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of residual disease on overall survival in women with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIB-IIIC vs stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.
    Sørensen SM; Schnack TH; Høgdall C
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Jan; 98(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 30168853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Re-evaluation of interval debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer].
    Ma Y; Li Y; Cui H; Liang XD; Tang ZJ; Li XP; Zhao Y; Wei LH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 May; 47(5):355-60. PubMed ID: 22883524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimizing the treatment of ovarian cancer: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking versus primary debulking surgery for epithelial ovarian cancers likely to have suboptimal resection.
    Gill SE; McGree ME; Weaver AL; Cliby WA; Langstraat CL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Feb; 144(2):266-273. PubMed ID: 27916269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preoperative HE4 expression in plasma predicts surgical outcome in primary ovarian cancer patients: results from the OVCAD study.
    Braicu EI; Fotopoulou C; Van Gorp T; Richter R; Chekerov R; Hall C; Butz H; Castillo-Tong DC; Mahner S; Zeillinger R; Concin N; Vergote I; Sehouli J
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Feb; 128(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 23178313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal primary management of bulky stage IIIC ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal carcinoma: Are the only options complete gross resection at primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy?
    Sioulas VD; Schiavone MB; Kadouri D; Zivanovic O; Roche KL; O'Cearbhaill R; Abu-Rustum NR; Levine DA; Sonoda Y; Gardner GJ; Leitao MM; Chi DS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 145(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 28238354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of Abdominal Wall Metastases on Prognosis in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.
    Ataseven B; du Bois A; Harter P; Prader S; Grimm C; Kurzeder C; Schneider S; Heikaus S; Kahl A; Traut A; Heitz F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Nov; 26(9):1594-1600. PubMed ID: 27654263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multicenter assessment of the ability of preoperative computed tomography scan and CA-125 to predict gross residual disease at primary debulking for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Suidan RS; Ramirez PT; Sarasohn DM; Teitcher JB; Iyer RB; Zhou Q; Iasonos A; Denesopolis J; Zivanovic O; Long Roche KC; Sonoda Y; Coleman RL; Abu-Rustum NR; Hricak H; Chi DS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 145(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 28209497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between serous and non-serous ovarian cancer as a prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma after primary debulking surgery.
    Hosono S; Kajiyama H; Mizuno K; Sakakibara K; Matsuzawa K; Takeda A; Kawai M; Nagasaka T; Kikkawa F
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2011 Oct; 16(5):524-32. PubMed ID: 21431342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patterns of Recurrence and Clinical Outcome of Patients With Stage IIIC to Stage IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in Complete Response After Primary Debulking Surgery Plus Chemotherapy or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery: An Italian Multicenter Retrospective Study.
    Gadducci A; Cosio S; Zizioli V; Notaro S; Tana R; Panattoni A; Sartori E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Jan; 27(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 27870700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Success rate and safety of tumor debulking with diaphragmatic surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and peritoneal cancer.
    Saitou M; Iida Y; Komazaki H; Narui C; Matsuno K; Kawabata A; Ueda K; Tanabe H; Takakura S; Isonishi S; Sasaki H; Okamoto A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Mar; 291(3):641-6. PubMed ID: 25182215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A preoperative low cancer antigen 125 level (≤25.8 mg/dl) is a useful criterion to determine the optimal timing of interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Morimoto A; Nagao S; Kogiku A; Yamamoto K; Miwa M; Wakahashi S; Ichida K; Sudo T; Yamaguchi S; Fujiwara K
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 46(6):517-21. PubMed ID: 26977055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Moving beyond "complete surgical resection" and "optimal": Is low-volume residual disease another option for primary debulking surgery?
    Manning-Geist BL; Hicks-Courant K; Gockley AA; Clark RM; Del Carmen MG; Growdon WB; Horowitz NS; Berkowitz RS; Muto MG; Worley MJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 150(2):233-238. PubMed ID: 29933927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Postoperative human epididymis protein 4 predicts primary therapy outcome in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Vallius T; Hynninen J; Auranen A; Matomäki J; Oksa S; Roering P; Grènman S
    Tumour Biol; 2017 Feb; 39(2):1010428317691189. PubMed ID: 28218038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of complete cytoreduction leaving no gross residual disease associated with radical cytoreductive surgical procedures on survival in advanced ovarian cancer.
    Chang SJ; Bristow RE; Ryu HS
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Dec; 19(13):4059-67. PubMed ID: 22766983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.