These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26691286)

  • 1. Combined Approach of Patch-Surfer and PL-PatchSurfer for Protein-Ligand Binding Prediction in CSAR 2013 and 2014.
    Zhu X; Shin WH; Kim H; Kihara D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1088-99. PubMed ID: 26691286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CSAR 2014: A Benchmark Exercise Using Unpublished Data from Pharma.
    Carlson HA; Smith RD; Damm-Ganamet KL; Stuckey JA; Ahmed A; Convery MA; Somers DO; Kranz M; Elkins PA; Cui G; Peishoff CE; Lambert MH; Dunbar JB
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1063-77. PubMed ID: 27149958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Docking and Scoring with Target-Specific Pose Classifier Succeeds in Native-Like Pose Identification But Not Binding Affinity Prediction in the CSAR 2014 Benchmark Exercise.
    Politi R; Convertino M; Popov K; Dokholyan NV; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1032-41. PubMed ID: 27050767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting Binding Poses and Affinities in the CSAR 2013-2014 Docking Exercises Using the Knowledge-Based Convex-PL Potential.
    Grudinin S; Popov P; Neveu E; Cheremovskiy G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1053-62. PubMed ID: 26569136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CSAR Benchmark Exercise 2013: Evaluation of Results from a Combined Computational Protein Design, Docking, and Scoring/Ranking Challenge.
    Smith RD; Damm-Ganamet KL; Dunbar JB; Ahmed A; Chinnaswamy K; Delproposto JE; Kubish GM; Tinberg CE; Khare SD; Dou J; Doyle L; Stuckey JA; Baker D; Carlson HA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1022-31. PubMed ID: 26419257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Target-specific native/decoy pose classifier improves the accuracy of ligand ranking in the CSAR 2013 benchmark.
    Fourches D; Politi R; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jan; 55(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 25521713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PatchSurfers: Two methods for local molecular property-based binding ligand prediction.
    Shin WH; Bures MG; Kihara D
    Methods; 2016 Jan; 93():41-50. PubMed ID: 26427548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PL-PatchSurfer: a novel molecular local surface-based method for exploring protein-ligand interactions.
    Hu B; Zhu X; Monroe L; Bures MG; Kihara D
    Int J Mol Sci; 2014 Aug; 15(9):15122-45. PubMed ID: 25167137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting binding poses and affinity ranking in D3R Grand Challenge using PL-PatchSurfer2.0.
    Shin WH; Kihara D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Dec; 33(12):1083-1094. PubMed ID: 31506789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CSAR benchmark exercise 2011-2012: evaluation of results from docking and relative ranking of blinded congeneric series.
    Damm-Ganamet KL; Smith RD; Dunbar JB; Stuckey JA; Carlson HA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1853-70. PubMed ID: 23548044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CSAR Benchmark of Flexible MedusaDock in Affinity Prediction and Nativelike Binding Pose Selection.
    Nedumpully-Govindan P; Jemec DB; Ding F
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1042-52. PubMed ID: 26252196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lessons learned in empirical scoring with smina from the CSAR 2011 benchmarking exercise.
    Koes DR; Baumgartner MP; Camacho CJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1893-904. PubMed ID: 23379370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A New Scoring Function for Molecular Docking Based on AutoDock and AutoDock Vina.
    Tanchuk VY; Tanin VO; Vovk AI; Poda G
    Curr Drug Discov Technol; 2015; 12(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26302746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of GalaxyDock Based on the Community Structure-Activity Resource 2013 and 2014 Benchmark Studies.
    Shin WH; Lee GR; Seok C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):988-95. PubMed ID: 26583962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of the docking program SOL for CSAR benchmark.
    Sulimov AV; Kutov DC; Oferkin IV; Katkova EV; Sulimov VB
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1946-56. PubMed ID: 23829357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integration of Ligand and Structure Based Approaches for CSAR-2014.
    Prathipati P; Mizuguchi K
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):974-87. PubMed ID: 26492437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting binding affinity of CSAR ligands using both structure-based and ligand-based approaches.
    Fourches D; Muratov E; Ding F; Dokholyan NV; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1915-22. PubMed ID: 23809015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Choosing the Optimal Rigid Receptor for Docking and Scoring in the CSAR 2013/2014 Experiment.
    Baumgartner MP; Camacho CJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1004-12. PubMed ID: 26222931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.