These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26691614)

  • 1. Training on hearing protector insertion improves noise attenuation.
    Samelli AG; Rocha CH; Theodósio P; Moreira RR; Neves-Lobo IF
    Codas; 2015; 27(6):514-9. PubMed ID: 26691614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
    Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
    Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic Evaluation of the Relationship between Physical and Psychoacoustical Measurements of Hearing Protectors' Attenuation.
    Nélisse H; Le Cocq C; Boutin J; Laville F; Voix J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(12):829-44. PubMed ID: 26023884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of hearing protectors by workers that participate in hearing preservation programs: a preliminary study.
    Gonçalves CG; Lüders D; Guirado DS; Albizu EJ; Marques JM
    Codas; 2015; 27(4):309-18. PubMed ID: 26398252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the hearing protector in a real work situation using the field-microphone-in-real-ear method.
    Rocha CH; Longo IA; Moreira RR; Samelli AG
    Codas; 2016 Apr; 28(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 27191871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
    Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noise attenuation and proper insertion of earplugs into ear canals.
    Toivonen M; Pääkkönen R; Savolainen S; Lehtomäki K
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2002 Aug; 46(6):527-30. PubMed ID: 12176767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of training on hearing protector attenuation.
    Murphy WJ; Stephenson MR; Byrne DC; Witt B; Duran J
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):132-41. PubMed ID: 21368438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The insertion loss distribution function of an ear plug, and its implications for the ear plug acceptability.
    Lenzuni P; Annesi D; Nataletti P
    Noise Health; 2020; 22(105):35-45. PubMed ID: 33380615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Training in using earplugs or using earplugs with a higher than necessary noise reduction rating? A randomized clinical trial.
    Salmani Nodoushan M; Mehrparvar AH; Torab Jahromi M; Safaei S; Mollasadeghi A
    Int J Occup Environ Med; 2014 Oct; 5(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 25270008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Measurement and evaluation of personal attenuation rating before and after the training of the noise-exposed workers wearing foam earplugs].
    Liu J; Wang X; Zhang R; Bao YH; Gu KF; Pan LP
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2024 Aug; 42(8):589-593. PubMed ID: 39223044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech recognition in noise under hearing protection: A computational study of the combined effects of hearing loss and hearing protector attenuation.
    Giguère C; Berger EH
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 1():S30-40. PubMed ID: 26840922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spectral analysis of hearing protector impulsive insertion loss.
    Fackler CJ; Berger EH; Murphy WJ; Stergar ME
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup1):13-21. PubMed ID: 27885881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noise attenuation of earplugs as measured by hREAT and F-MIRE methods in a Japanese metal manufacturing plant.
    Kabe I; Kochi T; Tsuruoka H; Tonegawa T; Denda I; Nonogi M; Tsuiki H; Mizoue T; Tanaka S
    J Occup Health; 2012; 54(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 22673642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between comfort and attenuation measurements for two types of earplugs.
    Byrne DC; Davis RR; Shaw PB; Specht BM; Holland AN
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):86-92. PubMed ID: 21368433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hearing protector fit testing with off-shore oil-rig inspectors in Louisiana and Texas.
    Murphy WJ; Themann CL; Murata TK
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):688-98. PubMed ID: 27414471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Adequacy of personal hearing protection devices].
    Peretti A; Pedrielli F; di Bisceglie AP; Bonomini F
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2010; 32(4 Suppl):267-70. PubMed ID: 21438278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.