These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2669350)

  • 1. A peer review of a peer review organization.
    Dippe SE; Bell MM; Wells MA; Lyons W; Clester S
    West J Med; 1989 Jul; 151(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 2669350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Defining the appropriate use of community hospital beds.
    Donald IP; Jay T; Linsell J; Foy C
    Br J Gen Pract; 2001 Feb; 51(463):95-100. PubMed ID: 11217640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review organization payment denials: comparative analysis of emergency department and non-emergency-department admissions.
    Overton DT; Kobernick MS; Sokolowski P; Belcher V
    J Emerg Med; 1992; 10(4):401-5. PubMed ID: 1430975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The appropriateness evaluation protocol: a technique for assessing unnecessary days of hospital care.
    Gertman PM; Restuccia JD
    Med Care; 1981 Aug; 19(8):855-71. PubMed ID: 7196975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PRO review of hospital admissions of Medicare patients.
    Akhter MN
    Mo Med; 1985 Mar; 82(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 3919255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A qualitative study of why general practitioners admit to community hospitals.
    Grant JA; Dowell J
    Br J Gen Pract; 2002 Aug; 52(481):628-30, 632-5. PubMed ID: 12171220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review organizations. Promises and potential pitfalls.
    Dans PE; Weiner JP; Otter SE
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Oct; 313(18):1131-7. PubMed ID: 3930964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Appropriateness of admissions and hospitalization days in an acute-care teaching hospital.
    Baré ML; Prat A; Lledo L; Asenjo MA; Salleras L
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1995; 43(4):328-36. PubMed ID: 7667539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Florida initiative aims to slash unnecessary admissions due to 'catch-all' dehydration diagnosis.
    Clin Resour Manag; 2001 May; 2(5):77-9, 65. PubMed ID: 11386006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medicare program; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO) reconsiderations and appeals--HCFA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(74):15364-74. PubMed ID: 10299992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Providers question PROs' effectiveness. Critics contend peer review organizations are too costly and fail to improve the quality of care.
    Rothschild RD
    Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):28-32, 38. PubMed ID: 10119535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physicians practicing in hospitals: implications for a medical staff policy.
    Miller ME; Welch WP; Englert E
    Inquiry; 1995; 32(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 7601518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Whither the PRO? Analysis of the effectiveness of three Medicare peer review organizations in a Florida hospital.
    Fleegler BM; Wolk M; McCarville J
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1995 Mar; 82(3):203-5. PubMed ID: 7738525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reducing unnecessary Medicare hospital admissions for chest pain in Arizona and Florida.
    Richards F; Pitluk H; Collier P; Powell S; Dion C; Struchen-Shellhorn W; Plunkett M
    Prof Case Manag; 2008; 13(2):74-84; quiz 85-6. PubMed ID: 18344829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between inappropriate admissions and days of care: implications for utilization management.
    Booth BM; Ludke RL; Wakefield DS; Kern DC; du Mond CE
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1991; 36(3):421-37. PubMed ID: 10170796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. West Virginia Medical Institute: the Quality Improvement Organization for West Virginia.
    Brehm JG; Smith SM
    W V Med J; 2004; 100(5):178-80. PubMed ID: 15617461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utilization review in the United States: results from a 1976-1977 national survey of hospitals.
    Gertman PM; Monheit AC; Anderson JJ; Eagle JB; Levenson DK
    Med Care; 1979 Aug; 17(8 Suppl):i-iii, 1-148. PubMed ID: 381795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physician responsibility for the cost of unnecessary medical services.
    Eisenberg JM; Rosoff AJ
    N Engl J Med; 1978 Jul; 299(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 566381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One peer review organization's experience in developing hospital peer groups.
    Sumner BM; Thompson MS; Suarez WG; Davis M; Bell JA; Shanedling SB
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1993; 1(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 10135642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer Review Organizations: the future agenda. A report of the American Medical Peer Review Association's Task Force on Peer Review Organization Implementation.
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1986 Aug; 1(3):83-90. PubMed ID: 2980883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.