These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2669350)

  • 41. Patterns of utilization for the Minnesota senior health options program.
    Kane RL; Homyak P; Bershadsky B; Flood S; Zhang H
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2004 Dec; 52(12):2039-44. PubMed ID: 15571539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Current trends in HIV-related hospital admissions and their impact on hospital resource utilization in Ontario.
    Hyland MJ; Bailey G; Rawji M; Peck LL; Hyland RH; Chan CK
    Clin Invest Med; 1997 Apr; 20(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 9088665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Factors influencing inappropriate hospitalization in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: physicians' perspectives.
    Al-Omar BA; Al-Assaf AF; Al-Aiban KM; Kalash KK; Javed F
    East Mediterr Health J; 2006; 12 Suppl 2():S195-206. PubMed ID: 17361691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Medicare program; appeal rights and procedures for beneficiaries enrolled in prepaid health care plans--HCFA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1994 Nov; 59(223):59933-43. PubMed ID: 10138801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The PRO utilization and quality review process: an overview--Part I.
    Politser P
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 May; 74(5):17-22. PubMed ID: 10303472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Unnecessary hospitalization of Medicare patients in Ohio. A preliminary profile.
    Brooks JH; Renz KK; White SE; Richardson SL
    Am J Med Qual; 1992; 7(4):116-9. PubMed ID: 1472875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. PRO changes under the fourth scope of work for Medicare.
    Kingsley DI
    N J Med; 1991 Jul; 88(7):499-500. PubMed ID: 1891129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A trial of structured implicit review of randomly selected peer review organization cases.
    Burney RE; Gies ME; Williams D; Connolly KW; McKinney MT
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1993; 1(4):214-8. PubMed ID: 10135638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Putting "peer" into PRO.
    Carroll RP
    Tex Med; 1989 Jun; 85(6):69-72. PubMed ID: 2660318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Appropriateness of medical care. Findings, strategies.
    Kelly JT; Kellie SE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1990 Nov; 114(11):1119-21. PubMed ID: 2241520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The Medicare peer review organization program: what every physician should known about PRO activities and how to handle notices. A report from the LSMS Physician/Patient Advocacy Committee.
    J La State Med Soc; 1991 Aug; 143(8):31-6. PubMed ID: 1940567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Status determined before bed assignment. UR nurses, physicians work together to get it correct.
    Hosp Case Manag; 2009 Apr; 17(4):53-4, 59. PubMed ID: 19526671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Peer review committees and state licensing boards: responding to allegations of physician misconduct.
    Meyer DJ; Price M
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 22635290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. PRO myths vs. facts.
    Harrop DE
    Pa Med; 1992 Nov; 95(11):34. PubMed ID: 1437223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An R.N. makes the medical peer-review team.
    Kellogg N
    RN; 1976 Apr; 39(4):73-4, 76, 78 passim. PubMed ID: 1045442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. How to overcome barriers to effective audit.
    Barnes RH
    Hosp Med Staff; 1976 May; 5(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 1035591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Physician peer review: have we gone far enough or too far?
    Cardwell MS; Gay JW
    Mo Med; 1991 Apr; 88(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 1857331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Urological emergency admissions to a community hospital: a review.
    Atkins SO
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1983 Jun; 75(6):557-9. PubMed ID: 6876189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Physicians and the Peer Review Organization review.
    Gosfield AG
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1986 May; 1(2):30-7. PubMed ID: 2980878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Nurses to review nursing care as advisory group to PSRO.
    Hadley RD
    Am Nurse; 1977 Oct; 9(10):3. PubMed ID: 337863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.