These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26693528)

  • 1. [Not Available].
    Lesur G
    Endoscopy; 2015 Oct; 47(10):965. PubMed ID: 26693528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Show me how you remove small polyps and I'll tell you who you are.
    Regula J; Pietrzak A
    Endoscopy; 2015 Oct; 47(10):876-7. PubMed ID: 26417970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forceps versus snare polypectomies in colorectal cancer screening: are we adhering to the guidelines?
    Britto-Arias M; Waldmann E; Jeschek P; Gessl I; Sallinger D; Bannert C; Weber M; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch A; Ferlitsch M
    Endoscopy; 2015 Oct; 47(10):898-902. PubMed ID: 26115462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recent advances to improve the endoscopic detection and differentiation of early colorectal neoplasia.
    Galloro G; Ruggiero S; Russo T; Saunders B
    Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jan; 17 Suppl 1():25-30. PubMed ID: 25511858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [International status colorectal cancer screening and quality assurance of screening-colonoscopy].
    Patera N; Wild C
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2013 Sep; 163(17-18):409-19. PubMed ID: 24006047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Colonoscopic surveillance following adenoma removal.
    Atkin WS; Valori R; Kuipers EJ; Hoff G; Senore C; Segnan N; Jover R; Schmiegel W; Lambert R; Pox C;
    Endoscopy; 2012 Sep; 44 Suppl 3():SE151-63. PubMed ID: 23012119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Quality assurance in endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis.
    Valori R; Rey JF; Atkin WS; Bretthauer M; Senore C; Hoff G; Kuipers EJ; Altenhofen L; Lambert R; Minoli G;
    Endoscopy; 2012 Sep; 44 Suppl 3():SE88-105. PubMed ID: 23012124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can Technology Improve the Quality of Colonoscopy?
    Thirumurthi S; Ross WA; Raju GS
    Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2016 Jul; 18(7):38. PubMed ID: 27255334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assurance in colonoscopy for colorectal cancer diagnosis.
    Macken E; Moreels T; Vannoote J; Siersema PD; Van Cutsem E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 20951537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How good is your dentist? How good is your endoscopist? The quality imperative.
    Lieberman D
    Gastroenterology; 2012 Feb; 142(2):194-6. PubMed ID: 22178380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Colonoscopy Surveillance After Colorectal Cancer Resection.
    Rusiecki J; Cifu AS
    JAMA; 2017 Dec; 318(23):2346-2347. PubMed ID: 29260211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trends in quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria.
    Waldmann E; Gessl I; Sallinger D; Jeschek P; Britto-Arias M; Heinze G; Fasching E; Weiss W; Gschwantler M; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Endoscopy; 2016 Dec; 48(12):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 27576182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to Ensure Patient Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance in Your Practice.
    Hassan C; Kaminski MF; Repici A
    Gastroenterology; 2018 Aug; 155(2):252-257. PubMed ID: 29964039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Guideline Adherence to Colonoscopic Surveillance Intervals after Polypectomy in Korea: Results from a Nationwide Survey.
    Hong S; Suh M; Choi KS; Park B; Cha JM; Kim HS; Jun JK; Han DS
    Gut Liver; 2018 Jul; 12(4):426-432. PubMed ID: 29429156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Longitudinal adherence to fecal occult blood testing impacts colorectal cancer screening quality.
    Gellad ZF; Stechuchak KM; Fisher DA; Olsen MK; McDuffie JR; Ostbye T; Yancy WS
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2011 Jun; 106(6):1125-34. PubMed ID: 21304501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reply to Heresbach & Pienkowski.
    Hassan C
    Endoscopy; 2014 Jun; 46(6):541. PubMed ID: 24870711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reply to Castells et al.
    Hassan C; Dumonceau JM
    Endoscopy; 2015 Jan; 47(1):88. PubMed ID: 25532114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and effectiveness of colonoscopy: how do we bridge the gap?
    Hewett DG; Kahi CJ; Rex DK
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2010 Oct; 20(4):673-84. PubMed ID: 20889071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Follow-up after colonic polypectomy in 2014: is there a French paradox?
    Heresbach D; Pienkowski P
    Endoscopy; 2014 Jun; 46(6):540. PubMed ID: 24870710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postpolypectomy surveillance in patients with adenomas and serrated lesions: a proposal for risk stratification in the context of organized colorectal cancer-screening programs.
    Castells A; Andreu M; Binefa G; Fité A; Font R; Espinàs JA
    Endoscopy; 2015 Jan; 47(1):86-7. PubMed ID: 25532113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.