These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26693720)

  • 1. All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more.
    Moher D; Stewart L; Shekelle P
    Syst Rev; 2015 Dec; 4():183. PubMed ID: 26693720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Knowledge Syntheses in Medical Education: Demystifying Scoping Reviews.
    Thomas A; Lubarsky S; Durning SJ; Young ME
    Acad Med; 2017 Feb; 92(2):161-166. PubMed ID: 27782918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Publishing systematic reviews in Canadian family physician.
    Reid T
    Can Fam Physician; 2005 Sep; 51(9):1183, 1187. PubMed ID: 16190166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.
    Peters MD; Godfrey CM; Khalil H; McInerney P; Parker D; Soares CB
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 26134548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scoping reviews in occupational therapy: the what, why, and how to.
    McKinstry C; Brown T; Gustafsson L
    Aust Occup Ther J; 2014 Apr; 61(2):58-66. PubMed ID: 24125011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic reviews: challenging dogmas and uncovering potential harms.
    Wille-Jørgensen P; Renehan AG
    Colorectal Dis; 2005 Jan; 7(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 15606576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic reviews for the Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research: going where the science takes us.
    Schünemann HJ; Castelli M; Muti P
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Jun; 26(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 19069300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Registration of systematic reviews: PROSPERO.
    Chien PF; Khan KS; Siassakos D
    BJOG; 2012 Jul; 119(8):903-5. PubMed ID: 22703418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
    Leibovici L; Reeves D
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2005 Nov; 56(5):803-4. PubMed ID: 16166177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thoughts about conceptual models, theories, and literature reviews.
    Fawcett J
    Nurs Sci Q; 2013 Jul; 26(3):285-8. PubMed ID: 23818479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodological Guidance for a Quality Review Article.
    Heyn PC; Meeks S; Pruchno R
    Gerontologist; 2019 Mar; 59(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 30698698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reflections: reviews, reviewers.
    Chaitow L
    J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2015 Jan; 19(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 25603737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: asking authors, peer reviewers, editors and funders to do better].
    Moher D; Liberati A
    Med Clin (Barc); 2010 Oct; 135(11):505-6. PubMed ID: 20462608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [How to write a good clinical review?].
    Krause BJ; Khan C; Antoch G
    Nuklearmedizin; 2015; 54(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 25774019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
    Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Working together to improve the evidence base: abridged Cochrane reviews in
    Low N
    Sex Transm Infect; 2019 Feb; 95(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 30341235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interventions to reduce injuries when transferring patients: a critical appraisal of reviews and a realist synthesis.
    Thomas DR; Thomas YL
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2014 Oct; 51(10):1381-94. PubMed ID: 24767612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A response to Harris, Gould, and Fujiura: Beyond scoping reviews: a case for mixed-methods research reviews.
    Fitzgerald SM; Rumrill PD; Merchant WR
    Work; 2015 Jan; 50(2):1-12. PubMed ID: 25503884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reviews.
    Richards D
    Evid Based Dent; 2012; 13(4):100. PubMed ID: 23258169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contemporary reviews in toxicology.
    Johnson JA; Miller GW
    Toxicol Sci; 2014 Nov; 142(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 25385813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.