308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26693900)
1. Utility of the CPS+EG staging system in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Marmé F; Lederer B; Blohmer JU; Costa SD; Denkert C; Eidtmann H; Gerber B; Hanusch C; Hilfrich J; Huober J; Jackisch C; Kümmel S; Loibl S; Paepke S; Untch M; von Minckwitz G; Schneeweiss A
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Jan; 53():65-74. PubMed ID: 26693900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic value of Ki67 expression in HR-negative breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Tan QX; Qin QH; Yang WP; Mo QG; Wei CY
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(10):6862-70. PubMed ID: 25400769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Neo-Bioscore Update for Staging Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Incorporation of Prognostic Biologic Factors Into Staging After Treatment.
Mittendorf EA; Vila J; Tucker SL; Chavez-MacGregor M; Smith BD; Symmans WF; Sahin AA; Hortobagyi GN; Hunt KK
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jul; 2(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 26986538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic stratification ability of the CPS+EG scoring system in HER2-low and HER2-zero early breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Roussot N; Constantin G; Desmoulins I; Bergeron A; Arnould L; Beltjens F; Mayeur D; Kaderbhai C; Hennequin A; Jankowski C; Padeano MM; Costaz H; Jacinto S; Michel E; Amet A; Coutant C; Costa B; Jouannaud C; Deblock M; Levy C; Ferrero JM; Kerbrat P; Brain E; Mouret-Reynier MA; Coudert B; Bertaut A; Ladoire S
Eur J Cancer; 2024 May; 202():114037. PubMed ID: 38554542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utility of the CPS + EG scoring system in triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Marmé F; Solbach C; Michel L; Schneeweiss A; Blohmer JU; Huober J; Fasching PA; Jackisch C; Nekljudova V; Link T; Rhiem K; Rey J; Denkert C; Hanusch C; Tesch H; Lederer B; Loibl S; Untch M
Eur J Cancer; 2021 Aug; 153():203-212. PubMed ID: 34186505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combining Clinical and Pathologic Staging Variables Has Prognostic Value in Predicting Local-regional Recurrence Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.
Vila J; Teshome M; Tucker SL; Woodward WA; Chavez-MacGregor M; Hunt KK; Mittendorf EA
Ann Surg; 2017 Mar; 265(3):574-580. PubMed ID: 27735826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes.
von Minckwitz G; Untch M; Blohmer JU; Costa SD; Eidtmann H; Fasching PA; Gerber B; Eiermann W; Hilfrich J; Huober J; Jackisch C; Kaufmann M; Konecny GE; Denkert C; Nekljudova V; Mehta K; Loibl S
J Clin Oncol; 2012 May; 30(15):1796-804. PubMed ID: 22508812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes.
Carey LA; Dees EC; Sawyer L; Gatti L; Moore DT; Collichio F; Ollila DW; Sartor CI; Graham ML; Perou CM
Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Apr; 13(8):2329-34. PubMed ID: 17438091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy-induced changes in immunohistochemical expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2, and Ki-67 in patients with breast cancer.
Avci N; Deligonul A; Tolunay S; Cubukcu E; Fatih Olmez O; Ulas A; Hartavi M; Kurt E; Evrensel T
J BUON; 2015; 20(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 25778295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term outcome and pattern of relapse after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive primary breast cancer.
Shimizu C; Masuda N; Yoshimura K; Tsuda H; Mano M; Ando M; Tamura K; Fujiwara Y
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2009 Aug; 39(8):484-90. PubMed ID: 19477897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cytoplasmic poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase expression is predictive and prognostic in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
von Minckwitz G; Müller BM; Loibl S; Budczies J; Hanusch C; Darb-Esfahani S; Hilfrich J; Weiss E; Huober J; Blohmer JU; du Bois A; Zahm DM; Khandan F; Hoffmann G; Gerber B; Eidtmann H; Fend F; Dietel M; Mehta K; Denkert C
J Clin Oncol; 2011 Jun; 29(16):2150-7. PubMed ID: 21519019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differential response of triple-negative breast cancer to a docetaxel and carboplatin-based neoadjuvant treatment.
Chang HR; Glaspy J; Allison MA; Kass FC; Elashoff R; Chung DU; Gornbein J
Cancer; 2010 Sep; 116(18):4227-37. PubMed ID: 20549829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Pathologic Response Evaluation Systems after Anthracycline with/without Taxane-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy among Different Subtypes of Breast Cancers.
Lee HJ; Park IA; Song IH; Kim SB; Jung KH; Ahn JH; Ahn SH; Kim HH; Gong G
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0137885. PubMed ID: 26394326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor.
Loibl S; Weber K; Huober J; Krappmann K; Marmé F; Schem C; Engels K; Pfitzner BM; Kümmel S; Furlanetto J; Hartmann A; Darb-Esfahani S; Müller V; Staebler A; von Minckwitz G; Kronenwett R; Denkert C
Clin Cancer Res; 2018 Jul; 24(14):3358-3365. PubMed ID: 29618617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. PIK3CA mutations are associated with lower rates of pathologic complete response to anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (her2) therapy in primary HER2-overexpressing breast cancer.
Loibl S; von Minckwitz G; Schneeweiss A; Paepke S; Lehmann A; Rezai M; Zahm DM; Sinn P; Khandan F; Eidtmann H; Dohnal K; Heinrichs C; Huober J; Pfitzner B; Fasching PA; Andre F; Lindner JL; Sotiriou C; Dykgers A; Guo S; Gade S; Nekljudova V; Loi S; Untch M; Denkert C
J Clin Oncol; 2014 Oct; 32(29):3212-20. PubMed ID: 25199759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immunohistochemical surrogate markers of breast cancer molecular classes predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a single institutional experience with 359 cases.
Bhargava R; Beriwal S; Dabbs DJ; Ozbek U; Soran A; Johnson RR; Brufsky AM; Lembersky BC; Ahrendt GM
Cancer; 2010 Mar; 116(6):1431-9. PubMed ID: 20131351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic factors in operable breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: towards a quantification of residual disease.
Mombelli S; Kwiatkowski F; Abrial C; Wang-Lopez Q; de Boissieu P; Garbar C; Bensussan A; Curé H
Oncology; 2015; 88(5):261-72. PubMed ID: 25573741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in young breast cancer patients: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from eight prospectively randomized controlled trials.
Loibl S; Jackisch C; Lederer B; Untch M; Paepke S; Kümmel S; Schneeweiss A; Huober J; Hilfrich J; Hanusch C; Gerber B; Eidtmann H; Denkert C; Costa SD; Blohmer JU; Nekljudova V; Mehta K; von Minckwitz G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Jul; 152(2):377-87. PubMed ID: 26109347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic value of receptor conversion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a prospective observational study.
Jin X; Jiang YZ; Chen S; Yu KD; Shao ZM; Di GH
Oncotarget; 2015 Apr; 6(11):9600-11. PubMed ID: 25826079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of Residual Proliferative Cancer Burden as a Predictor of Long-Term Outcome Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer.
Miglietta F; Dieci MV; Tsvetkova V; Griguolo G; Vernaci G; Menichetti A; Faggioni G; Giarratano T; Mioranza E; Genovesi E; Cumerlato E; Bottosso M; Saibene T; Michieletto S; Lo Mele M; Conte P; Guarneri V
Oncologist; 2020 Sep; 25(9):e1355-e1362. PubMed ID: 32618068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
