These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26694852)
1. Randomized Noninferiority Trial Comparing Diagnostic Yield of Cytopathologist-guided versus 7 passes for EUS-FNA of Pancreatic Masses. Lee LS; Nieto J; Watson RR; Hwang AL; Muthusamy VR; Walter L; Jajoo K; Ryou MK; Saltzman JR; Saunders MD; Suleiman S; Kadiyala V Dig Endosc; 2016 May; 28(4):469-475. PubMed ID: 26694852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High-resolution endoscopic ultrasound imaging and the number of needle passages are significant factors predicting high yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid masses without an on-site cytopathologist. Jeong SH; Yoon HH; Kim EJ; Kim YJ; Kim YS; Cho JH Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jan; 96(2):e5782. PubMed ID: 28079803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical impact of immediate on-site cytopathology evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. Wani S; Mullady D; Early DS; Rastogi A; Collins B; Wang JF; Marshall C; Sams SB; Yen R; Rizeq M; Romanas M; Ulusarac O; Brauer B; Attwell A; Gaddam S; Hollander TG; Hosford L; Johnson S; Kushnir V; Amateau SK; Kohlmeier C; Azar RR; Vargo J; Fukami N; Shah RJ; Das A; Edmundowicz SA Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 110(10):1429-39. PubMed ID: 26346868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial. Chen YI; Chatterjee A; Berger R; Kanber Y; Wyse J; Lam E; Gan I; Auger M; Kenshil S; Telford J; Donnellan F; Quinlan J; Lutzak G; Alshamsi F; Parent J; Waschke K; Alghamdi A; Barkun J; Metrakos P; Chaudhury P; Martel M; Dorreen A; Candido K; Miller C; Adam V; Barkun A; Zogopoulos G; Wong C Endoscopy; 2022 Jan; 54(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 33506455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cytology with rapid on-site examination (ROSE) does not improve diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA of pancreatic cystic lesions. Estrada P; Benson M; Gopal D; Buehler D; Pfau P Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 31356003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses. Iglesias-Garcia J; Dominguez-Munoz JE; Abdulkader I; Larino-Noia J; Eugenyeva E; Lozano-Leon A; Forteza-Vila J Am J Gastroenterol; 2011 Sep; 106(9):1705-10. PubMed ID: 21483464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increasing Number of Passes Beyond 4 Does Not Increase Sensitivity of Detection of Pancreatic Malignancy by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration. Mohamadnejad M; Mullady D; Early DS; Collins B; Marshall C; Sams S; Yen R; Rizeq M; Romanas M; Nawaz S; Ulusarac O; Hollander T; Wilson RH; Simon VC; Kushnir V; Amateau SK; Brauer BC; Gaddam S; Azar RR; Komanduri S; Shah R; Das A; Edmundowicz S; Muthusamy VR; Rastogi A; Wani S Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jul; 15(7):1071-1078.e2. PubMed ID: 28025154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rapid on-site evaluation of EUS-FNA by cytopathologist: an experience of a tertiary hospital. Ecka RS; Sharma M Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1075-80. PubMed ID: 24166808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles. Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A meta-analysis of endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration compared to endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle biopsy: diagnostic yield and the value of onsite cytopathological assessment. Khan MA; Grimm IS; Ali B; Nollan R; Tombazzi C; Ismail MK; Baron TH Endosc Int Open; 2017 May; 5(5):E363-E375. PubMed ID: 28497108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration of lymph nodes and solid masses: factors influencing the cellularity and adequacy of the aspirate. Wee E; Lakhtakia S; Gupta R; Sekaran A; Kalapala R; Monga A; Arjunan S; Reddy DN J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Jul; 46(6):487-93. PubMed ID: 22688144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study. Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses. de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Hathorn KE; Madruga-Neto AC; Lee LS; Thompson CC Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective evaluation of the optimal number of 25-gauge needle passes for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions in the absence of an onsite cytopathologist. Suzuki R; Irisawa A; Bhutani MS; Hikichi T; Takagi T; Sato A; Sato M; Ikeda T; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Tasaki K; Obara K; Ohira H Dig Endosc; 2012 Nov; 24(6):452-6. PubMed ID: 23078439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid on-site evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of lymph nodes does not increase diagnostic yield: A randomized, multicenter trial. Kappelle WFW; Van Leerdam ME; Schwartz MP; Bülbül M; Buikhuisen WA; Brink MA; Sie-Go DMDS; Pullens HJM; Nikolakopoulos S; Van Diest PJ; Leenders M; Moons LMG; Bogte A; Siersema PD; Vleggaar FP Am J Gastroenterol; 2018 May; 113(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 29681624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Basic technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for solid lesions: How many passes? Petrone MC; Arcidiacono PG Endosc Ultrasound; 2014 Jan; 3(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 24949407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic yield of malignancy during EUS-guided FNA of solid lesions with and without a stylet: a prospective, single blind, randomized, controlled trial. Wani S; Early D; Kunkel J; Leathersich A; Hovis CE; Hollander TG; Kohlmeier C; Zelenka C; Azar R; Edmundowicz S; Collins B; Liu J; Hall M; Mullady D Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):328-35. PubMed ID: 22695205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimal number of needle passes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic lesions. Uehara H; Sueyoshi H; Takada R; Fukutake N; Katayama K; Ashida R; Ioka T; Takenaka A; Nagata S; Tomita Y Pancreatology; 2015; 15(4):392-6. PubMed ID: 25979252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. EUS-guided FNA diagnostic yield of malignancy in solid pancreatic masses: a benchmark for quality performance measurement. Savides TJ; Donohue M; Hunt G; Al-Haddad M; Aslanian H; Ben-Menachem T; Chen VK; Coyle W; Deutsch J; DeWitt J; Dhawan M; Eckardt A; Eloubeidi M; Esker A; Gordon SR; Gress F; Ikenberry S; Joyce AM; Klapman J; Lo S; Maluf-Filho F; Nickl N; Singh V; Wills J; Behling C Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Aug; 66(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 17643700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]