687 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26696100)
21. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The marginal seal of a flowable composite, an injectable resin modified glass ionomer and a compomer in primary molars--an in vitro study.
Prabhakar AR; Madan M; Raju OS
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Jun; 21(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 14700335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reliability of different techniques to assess marginal defects of Class II restorations in retrieved primary molars: a visual-tactile, SEM, dye penetration and polarized light microscopy study.
Fuks AB; Araujo FB; Donly KJ; Cervantes M
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2002 Oct; 19(4):6-16, 67. PubMed ID: 12510251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fracture frequency and longevity of fractured resin composite, polyacid-modified resin composite, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement class IV restorations: an up to 14 years of follow-up.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Apr; 14(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 19504133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Two-year clinical evaluation of three restorative materials in primary molars.
Daou MH; Tavernier B; Meyer JM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2009; 34(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 19953810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: a 2-year randomized clinical trial.
Atieh M
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 18(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 18328050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Observational: prospective study of indirect pulp treatment in primary molars using resin-modified glass ionomer and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate: a 12-month Follow-up.
Rosenberg L; Atar M; Daronch M; Honig A; Chey M; Funny MD; Cruz L
Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 23635886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Silver amalgam versus resin modified GIC class-II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical evaluation.
Dutta BN; Gauba K; Tewari A; Chawla HS
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Sep; 19(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 11817797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. WITHDRAWN: Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
Yengopal V; Harnekar SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD004483. PubMed ID: 27748505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
Ermiş RB
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Durability of a polyacid-modified composite resin (compomer) in primary molars. A multicenter study.
Andersson-Wenckert IE; Folkesson UH; van Dijken JW
Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Aug; 55(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 9298168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Vitremer restorative cement for children: three clinicians' observations in three pediatric dental practices.
Croll TP; Helpin ML; Donly KJ
ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(6):391-8, 374. PubMed ID: 11204061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radiographic assessment of primary molar pulpotomies restored with resin-based materials.
Guelmann M; McIlwain MF; Primosch RE
Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 15839391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinicians' choices of restorative materials for children.
Tran LA; Messer LB
Aust Dent J; 2003 Dec; 48(4):221-32. PubMed ID: 14738124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of retentive groove, sandblasting and cement type on the retentive strength of stainless steel crowns in primary second molars--an in vitro comparative study.
Veerabadhran MM; Reddy V; Nayak UA; Rao AP; Sundaram MA
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 22565513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Materials used to restore class II lesions in primary molars: a survey of California pediatric dentists.
Pair RL; Udin RD; Tanbonliong T
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 15646912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars.
Folkesson UH; Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW
Swed Dent J; 1999; 23(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 10371000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Durability of new restorative materials in Class III cavities.
van Dijken JW
J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 11317385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
