These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26696843)

  • 1. Efferent Modulation of Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Fine Structure.
    Zhao W; Dewey JB; Boothalingam S; Dhar S
    Front Syst Neurosci; 2015; 9():168. PubMed ID: 26696843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrically Evoked Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Effects on Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Guinea Pigs.
    Berezina-Greene MA; Guinan JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 18(1):153-163. PubMed ID: 27798720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency specificity and left-ear advantage of medial olivocochlear efferent modulation: a study based on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission.
    Xing D; Gong Q
    Neuroreport; 2017 Sep; 28(13):775-778. PubMed ID: 28538522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contralateral suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions declines with age: a comparison of findings in CBA mice with human listeners.
    Jacobson M; Kim S; Romney J; Zhu X; Frisina RD
    Laryngoscope; 2003 Oct; 113(10):1707-13. PubMed ID: 14520094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous measurement of noise-activated middle-ear muscle reflex and stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.
    Goodman SS; Keefe DH
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 7(2):125-39. PubMed ID: 16568366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold fine structure.
    Dewey JB; Lee J; Dhar S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Dec; 15(6):897-914. PubMed ID: 25245498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on otoacoustic emissions induced by swept tones.
    Shixiong Chen ; Yanbing Jin ; Lisheng Xu ; Guanglin Li
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():2733-6. PubMed ID: 26736857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency tuning of medial-olivocochlear-efferent acoustic reflexes in humans as functions of probe frequency.
    Lilaonitkul W; Guinan JJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar; 107(6):1598-611. PubMed ID: 22190630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs.
    Guinan JJ; Backus BC; Lilaonitkul W; Aharonson V
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2003 Dec; 4(4):521-40. PubMed ID: 12799992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
    Büki B; Wit HP; Avan P
    Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 852(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10661505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic stimulation of human medial olivocochlear efferents reduces stimulus-frequency and click-evoked otoacoustic emission delays: Implications for cochlear filter bandwidths.
    Francis NA; Guinan JJ
    Hear Res; 2010 Aug; 267(1-2):36-45. PubMed ID: 20430088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contralateral acoustic stimulation alters the magnitude and phase of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Deeter R; Abel R; Calandruccio L; Dhar S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2413-24. PubMed ID: 19894823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
    Souter M
    Hear Res; 1995 Nov; 91(1-2):167-77. PubMed ID: 8647718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Müller J; Janssen T; Zenner HP
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):83-92. PubMed ID: 17137736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Musicianship enhances ipsilateral and contralateral efferent gain control to the cochlea.
    Bidelman GM; Schneider AD; Heitzmann VR; Bhagat SP
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():275-283. PubMed ID: 27964936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in amplitude and phase of distortion-product otoacoustic emission fine-structure and separated components during efferent activation.
    Henin S; Thompson S; Abdelrazeq S; Long GR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2068-79. PubMed ID: 21476662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Profiles of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions from 0.5 to 20 kHz in Humans.
    Dewey JB; Dhar S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 18(1):89-110. PubMed ID: 27681700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect.
    Beim JA; Elliott M; Oxenham AJ; Wojtczak M
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Oct; 16(5):613-29. PubMed ID: 26153415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.