207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26696929)
1. Explicit Instructions Increase Cognitive Costs of Deception in Predictable Social Context.
Falkiewicz M; Sarzyńska J; Babula J; Szatkowska I; Grabowska A; Nęcka E
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1863. PubMed ID: 26696929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the truth interfere with our ability to deceive?
Osman M; Channon S; Fitzpatrick S
Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Oct; 16(5):901-6. PubMed ID: 19815796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. When deception becomes easy: the effects of task switching and goal neglect on the truth proportion effect.
Van Bockstaele B; Wilhelm C; Meijer E; Debey E; Verschuere B
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1666. PubMed ID: 26579047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deceptive Intentions: Can Cues to Deception Be Measured before a Lie Is Even Stated?
Ströfer S; Noordzij ML; Ufkes EG; Giebels E
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125237. PubMed ID: 26018573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. To err is human but not deceptive.
Walczyk JJ; Cockrell NF
Mem Cognit; 2022 Jan; 50(1):232-244. PubMed ID: 34136972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying deceptive hazard evaluation: An event-related potentials investigation.
Fu H; Qiu W; Ma H; Ma Q
PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182892. PubMed ID: 28793344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A truth that's told with bad intent: an ERP study of deception.
Carrión RE; Keenan JP; Sebanz N
Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 19836013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decreased respiratory sinus arrhythmia in individuals with deceptive intent.
Aikins DE; Martin DJ; Morgan CA
Psychophysiology; 2010 Jul; 47(4):633-6. PubMed ID: 20230501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implicit and explicit attitude dissociation in spontaneous deceptive behavior.
Jung KH; Lee JH
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep; 132(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 19577223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What if I Get Busted? Deception, Choice, and Decision-Making in Social Interaction.
Sip KE; Skewes JC; Marchant JL; McGregor WB; Roepstorff A; Frith CD
Front Neurosci; 2012; 6():58. PubMed ID: 22529772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Both High Cognitive Load and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Right Inferior Frontal Cortex Make Truth and Lie Responses More Similar.
Sánchez N; Masip J; Gómez-Ariza CJ
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():776. PubMed ID: 32508700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lying relies on the truth.
Debey E; De Houwer J; Verschuere B
Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):324-34. PubMed ID: 24859237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A repeated lie becomes a truth? The effect of intentional control and training on deception.
Hu X; Chen H; Fu G
Front Psychol; 2012; 3():488. PubMed ID: 23162520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lie, truth, lie: the role of task switching in a deception context.
Debey E; Liefooghe B; De Houwer J; Verschuere B
Psychol Res; 2015 May; 79(3):478-88. PubMed ID: 24923778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrophysiological markers of working memory usage as an index for truth-based lies.
Lo YH; Tseng P
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 18(6):1089-1104. PubMed ID: 30022430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deceptive but Not Honest Manipulative Actions Are Associated with Increased Interaction between Middle and Inferior Frontal gyri.
Kireev M; Korotkov A; Medvedeva N; Masharipov R; Medvedev S
Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():482. PubMed ID: 28912675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does willingness affect the N2-P3 effect of deceptive and honest responses?
Wu H; Hu X; Fu G
Neurosci Lett; 2009 Dec; 467(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 19818837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiation of deception using pupillary responses as an index of cognitive processing.
Dionisio DP; Granholm E; Hillix WA; Perrine WF
Psychophysiology; 2001 Mar; 38(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 11347866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Electrocortical Signature of Successful and Unsuccessful Deception in a Face-to-Face Social Interaction.
Wagner-Altendorf TA; van der Lugt AH; Banfield JF; Meyer C; Rohrbach C; Heldmann M; Münte TF
Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():277. PubMed ID: 32765242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
