These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26697649)
21. Supreme Court's decision adds little to antitrust analysis. Miles JJ Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jun; 9(12):12-4. PubMed ID: 10276709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Words can bite back. Lamacki W CDS Rev; 2015; 108(3):44. PubMed ID: 26058302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The Texas State Board of Dental Examiners - Sunset Review in Texas. Duncan DA Tex Dent J; 2015 Oct; 132(10):832-5. PubMed ID: 26710591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Federal Trade Commission antitrust enforcement in the dental profession. Ragan MR J Law Ethics Dent; 1990; 3():5-11. PubMed ID: 2098529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Reanalyzing reverse payment settlements: a solution to the patentee's dilemma. Wang Z Cornell Law Rev; 2014 Jul; 99(5):1227-58. PubMed ID: 25112001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Assuring access to dental care for low-income families in North Carolina. The NC Institute of Medicine Task Force Study. Silberman P; Wicker DA; Smith SH; DeFriese GH N C Med J; 2000; 61(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 10737031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The GDC - lifting the lid. Part 5: illegal practice. Mathewson H; Rudkin D Br Dent J; 2008 Aug; 205(3):153-5. PubMed ID: 18690193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Should the federal trade commission allow dentistry to require its members to adhere to a high standard in advertising? Allamano BL J Am Coll Dent; 1996; 63(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 8920065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. What level of scrutiny is required in an antitrust case? 2. Sfikas P J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Apr; 130(4):581-3. PubMed ID: 10203912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. N.C. deal may signal antitrust policy shift. Snow C Mod Healthc; 1997 Aug; 27(34):3, 16. PubMed ID: 10169328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The Supreme Court, antitrust and the health care field. Health Law Vigil; 1982 Oct; 5(22):1-14. PubMed ID: 10257142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Health planning and antitrust law: the implied amendment doctrine of the Rex Hospital case. Havighurst CC Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1984 Sep; 6(7):7-36. PubMed ID: 10268127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Striking out! Federal enforcers losing streak in antitrust cases shows need for new game plan. Hallam K Mod Healthc; 1998 Apr; 28(17):30-3. PubMed ID: 10179159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The State Board of Dental Examiners update. Roberts MB; Oneacre LP Tex Dent J; 2010 Oct; 127(10):1094-5. PubMed ID: 21180021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. So what issues are they tackling when talking with the Representatives and Senators? Pa Dent J (Harrisb); 2006; 73(3):27-8. PubMed ID: 16915914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: a view from the Federal Trade Commission. Horoschak MJ Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):17-24. PubMed ID: 10116790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Texas State Board of Dental Examiners approves rule changes and new "Jurisprudence Assessment". Black RC Tex Dent J; 2006 Sep; 123(9):879-81. PubMed ID: 17086948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Too many cooks. FTC, Justice Department call consent decrees ineffective. Taylor M Mod Healthc; 2004 Nov; 34(44):16. PubMed ID: 15554338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]