These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26697650)
1. How Will the U.S. Supreme Court's Decision in North Carolina Dental Affect the Regulation of the Professions? LeBuhn R J Am Coll Dent; 2015; 82(3):18-20. PubMed ID: 26697650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Closer Look at the North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners and Who Can Practice Dentistry. Parker MA J Am Coll Dent; 2015; 82(3):12-7. PubMed ID: 26697649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What Contract? With Whom? For What Purpose? DeFriese GH J Am Coll Dent; 2015; 82(3):21-4. PubMed ID: 26697651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Supreme Court ruling may determine the future of state-based professionai licensing. Owsiany DJ J Am Coll Dent; 2014; 81(4):51-5. PubMed ID: 25975126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. State Dental Boards and Public Protection: Fulfilling the Contract. Shampaine GS J Am Coll Dent; 2015; 82(3):25-30. PubMed ID: 26697652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A License to Labor. Weiss S State Legis; 2017 Jan; 43(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 28117565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Who Gets to Whiten Teeth? Hanley KJ N Y State Dent J; 2016 Apr; 82(3):2-4. PubMed ID: 27348941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. An FDA Legal Grab Bag: Severe Weather, a U.S. Supreme Court Slip Opinion, Working Interviews, Board of Pharmacy Fines and Patient Abandonment. Nicol G Todays FDA; 2015; 27(3):6-7, 9. PubMed ID: 26523306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The dental board's first look at your case. Rosen J J Mass Dent Soc; 2014; 63(2):12-3. PubMed ID: 25226768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Texas State Board of Dental Examiners disciplinary matrix. Neal CJ Tex Dent J; 2011 Aug; 128(8):748-52. PubMed ID: 21957788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. State Dental Boards Are Not Immune from Antitrust Liability. Schulte DJ J Mich Dent Assoc; 2015 Apr; 97(4):22, 73. PubMed ID: 26268002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Teeth-Whitening Debacle. Plunkett L N Y State Dent J; 2015; 81(4):4-7. PubMed ID: 26373026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. After Cruzan. The U. S. Supreme Court's decision settles the case but raises new questions. Johnson SH Health Prog; 1990 Oct; 71(8):38-41, 57. PubMed ID: 10107437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Supreme Court's decision adds little to antitrust analysis. Miles JJ Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jun; 9(12):12-4. PubMed ID: 10276709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A world without Roe: how different would it be? Glendon MA Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 2745061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Protecting patients from discrimination--the Americans with Disabilities Act and HIV infection. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 1998 Oct; 339(17):1255-9. PubMed ID: 9780348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Regulators and regulations: who will guard the guards? (or 'Quis custodiet ipsos custodes' as old Juvenal used to say). Kelleher M Dent Update; 2015 Jun; 42(5):406-10. PubMed ID: 26964442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Avera Marshall decision. What the Supreme Court's ruling means for hospitals and physicians. Struthers M; Knoedler T Minn Med; 2015 May; 98(5):29-31. PubMed ID: 26065185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]