These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26697650)
21. Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd: implications of the supreme court's decision for the people who matter most...the consumer. Jaquette I Am J Law Med; 2007; 33(1):97-117. PubMed ID: 17547356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The law and ethics in relation to dentists treating HIV-positive patients: report on a recent U.S. Supreme Court case. Graham PE; Harel-Reviv M J Can Dent Assoc; 1999 Jan; 65(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 9973763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Gonzales v Raich: the US supreme court's consideration captured the public policy debate about the medical use of marijuana. Lorber L Gend Med; 2005 Sep; 2(3):124-30. PubMed ID: 16290884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Too young to kill? U.S. Supreme Court treads a dangerous path in Roper v. Simmons. Sarkar SP J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(3):364-72. PubMed ID: 17872560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Supreme Court's surprising decision on the Medicaid expansion: how will the federal government and states proceed? Rosenbaum S; Westmoreland TM Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 Aug; 31(8):1663-72. PubMed ID: 22869643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. In the wake of the verdict: the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on the federal health law leaves lawmakers working out what it means for their states. King M State Legis; 2012; 38(7):46-7. PubMed ID: 22893930 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The Texas State Board of Dental Examiners - Sunset Review in Texas. Duncan DA Tex Dent J; 2015 Oct; 132(10):832-5. PubMed ID: 26710591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Pro-choice: a new militancy. Davis SE Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(6):32-3. PubMed ID: 2606658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Texas State Board of Dental Examiners--regulating the profession. Stuart ML Tex Dent J; 2013 Oct; 130(10):1000-2. PubMed ID: 24354157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Can Dentistry Have Two Contracts with the Public? Nash DA J Am Coll Dent; 2015; 82(3):4-11. PubMed ID: 26697648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court. Brown HO Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling on health care reform, hospitals and EDs still grapple with uncertainty, continued stress. ED Manag; 2012 Sep; 24(9):97-100. PubMed ID: 22946245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Nancy Cruzan in China. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):39-41. PubMed ID: 2228588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Supreme Court's Hyde decision: what is its significance? Waxman M; Enders RJ Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(3):51-3. PubMed ID: 10266389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. US Supreme Court may have to settle dispute over patenting DNA sequences. Dyer C BMJ; 2011 Sep; 343():d6187. PubMed ID: 21952463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues. Bryant MD Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The US Supreme Court's ruling on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Steinbrook R BMJ; 2012 Jun; 344():e4503. PubMed ID: 22753886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]