153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26698002)
1. Evaluating the Risk of Bias of a Study.
Faggion CM
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2015 Dec; 15(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 26698002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk of bias and magnitude of effect in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological review.
Koletsi D; Spineli LM; Lempesi E; Pandis N
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 38(3):308-12. PubMed ID: 26174770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.
Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L
Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of bias assessments and reporting quality of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials examining acupuncture for depression: An overview and meta-epidemiology study.
Luo S; Long Y; Xiao W; Wang X; Chen R; Guo Q; Liu J; Shao R; Du L; Chen M
J Evid Based Med; 2020 Feb; 13(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 32112515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of risk of bias in quasi-randomized controlled trials and randomized controlled trials reported in the
Kim JH; Kim TK; In J; Lee DK; Lee S; Kang H
Korean J Anesthesiol; 2017 Oct; 70(5):511-519. PubMed ID: 29046770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials of Moxibustion Using STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Moxibustion (STRICTOM) and Risk of Bias (ROB).
Kim SY; Lee EJ; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Jung IC; Kim YI
J Acupunct Meridian Stud; 2017 Aug; 10(4):261-275. PubMed ID: 28889843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of bias of randomized trials over time.
Reveiz L; Chapman E; Asial S; Munoz S; Bonfill X; Alonso-Coello P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 68(9):1036-45. PubMed ID: 26227423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Disagreements in risk of bias assessment for randomized controlled trials in hypertension-related Cochrane reviews.
Yao Y; Shen J; Luo J; Li N; Liao X; Zhang Y
Trials; 2024 Jun; 25(1):405. PubMed ID: 38907276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do acupuncture trials have lower risk of bias over the last five decades? A methodological study of 4 715 randomized controlled trials.
Long Y; Chen R; Guo Q; Luo S; Huang J; Du L
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234491. PubMed ID: 32520964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usability and sensitivity of the risk of bias assessment tool for randomized controlled trials of pharmacist interventions.
Tonin FS; Lopes LA; Rotta I; Bonetti AF; Pontarolo R; Correr CJ; Fernandez-Llimos F
Int J Clin Pharm; 2019 Jun; 41(3):785-792. PubMed ID: 30963446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Conduct and Reporting of Child Health Research: An Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in 2012 and Evaluation of Change over 5 Years.
Gates A; Hartling L; Vandermeer B; Caldwell P; Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG; Curtis S; Fernandes RM; Klassen TP; Williams K; Dyson MP
J Pediatr; 2018 Feb; 193():237-244.e37. PubMed ID: 29169611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk of Bias in Iranian Randomized Trials Included in Cochrane Reviews.
Kabir A; Sofi-Mahmudi A; Karimi Behnagh A; Eidkhani V; Baradaran HR; Kabiri P; Haghdoost A; Mesgarpour B
Arch Iran Med; 2022 Jun; 25(6):375-382. PubMed ID: 35943017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of the CONSORT statement on the amount of "unclear" Risk of Bias reporting in Cochrane Systematic Reviews.
Rademaker MM; Ramakers GGJ; Smit AL; Hooft L; Stegeman I
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235535. PubMed ID: 32650340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inter-review agreement of risk-of-bias judgments varied in Cochrane reviews.
Könsgen N; Barcot O; Heß S; Puljak L; Goossen K; Rombey T; Pieper D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 120():25-32. PubMed ID: 31866473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are Neonatal Trials Better Conducted and Reported over the Last 6 Decades? An Analysis on Their Risk-of-Bias Status in Cochrane Reviews.
Lai NM; Ong JMJ; Chen KH; Chaiyakunapruk N; Ovelman C; Soll R
Neonatology; 2019; 116(2):123-131. PubMed ID: 31108494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In Cochrane reviews, risk of bias assessments for allocation concealment were frequently not in line with Cochrane's Handbook guidance.
Propadalo I; Tranfic M; Vuka I; Barcot O; Pericic TP; Puljak L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():10-17. PubMed ID: 30312657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is the evaluation of risk of bias in periodontology and implant dentistry comprehensive? A systematic review.
Faggion CM; Listl S; Alarcón MA
J Clin Periodontol; 2015 May; 42(5):488-94. PubMed ID: 25809114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The judgement of biases included in the category "other bias" in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey.
Babic A; Pijuk A; Brázdilová L; Georgieva Y; Raposo Pereira MA; Poklepovic Pericic T; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):77. PubMed ID: 30971219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tools to Assess the Risk of Bias and Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Rehabilitation.
Armijo-Olivo S; Patrini M; Oliveira-Souza AIS; Dennett L; Arienti C; Dahchi M; Negrini S
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Aug; 102(8):1606-1613. PubMed ID: 33989599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of reporting randomised clinical trials in dental and medical research.
Sjögren P; Halling A
Br Dent J; 2002 Jan; 192(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 11838001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
