BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1946 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26698091)

  • 1. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
    van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of QTL minor allele frequency on genomic evaluation using real genotype data and simulated phenotypes in Japanese Black cattle.
    Uemoto Y; Sasaki S; Kojima T; Sugimoto Y; Watanabe T
    BMC Genet; 2015 Nov; 16():134. PubMed ID: 26586567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
    Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using selection index theory to estimate consistency of multi-locus linkage disequilibrium across populations.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Calus MP
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 26187501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of genotype imputation on the performance of GBLUP and Bayesian methods for genomic prediction.
    Chen L; Li C; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel F
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e101544. PubMed ID: 25025158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of QTL properties on the accuracy of multi-breed genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Calus MP; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 May; 47(1):42. PubMed ID: 25951906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes.
    Piccoli ML; Brito LF; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 28100165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A nested mixture model for genomic prediction using whole-genome SNP genotypes.
    Zeng J; Garrick D; Dekkers J; Fernando R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194683. PubMed ID: 29561877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multi-trait Bayesian method for mapping QTL and genomic prediction.
    Kemper KE; Bowman PJ; Hayes BJ; Visscher PM; Goddard ME
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Mar; 50(1):10. PubMed ID: 29571285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population.
    Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contributions of linkage disequilibrium and co-segregation information to the accuracy of genomic prediction.
    Sun X; Fernando R; Dekkers J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Oct; 48(1):77. PubMed ID: 27729012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy.
    Bolormaa S; Gore K; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
    Anim Genet; 2015 Oct; 46(5):544-56. PubMed ID: 26360638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of imputation to whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
    van Binsbergen R; Bink MC; Calus MP; van Eeuwijk FA; Hayes BJ; Hulsegge I; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jul; 46(1):41. PubMed ID: 25022768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
    Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reduction in accuracy of genomic prediction for ordered categorical data compared to continuous observations.
    Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):37. PubMed ID: 24912924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative trait loci markers derived from whole genome sequence data increases the reliability of genomic prediction.
    Brøndum RF; Su G; Janss L; Sahana G; Guldbrandtsen B; Boichard D; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jun; 98(6):4107-16. PubMed ID: 25892697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic and genomic basis of antibody response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) in gilts and sows.
    Serão NV; Kemp RA; Mote BE; Willson P; Harding JC; Bishop SC; Plastow GS; Dekkers JC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jul; 48(1):51. PubMed ID: 27417876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 98.