These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

487 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26698221)

  • 1. Uncertainty quantification for radiation measurements: Bottom-up error variance estimation using calibration information.
    Burr T; Croft S; Krieger T; Martin K; Norman C; Walsh S
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Feb; 108():49-57. PubMed ID: 26698221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A bottom-up approach in estimating the measurement uncertainty and other important considerations for quantitative analyses in drug testing for horses.
    Leung GN; Ho EN; Kwok WH; Leung DK; Tang FP; Wan TS; Wong AS; Wong CH; Wong JK; Yu NH
    J Chromatogr A; 2007 Sep; 1163(1-2):237-46. PubMed ID: 17628571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between bottom-up and top-down approaches in the estimation of measurement uncertainty.
    Lee JH; Choi JH; Youn JS; Cha YJ; Song W; Park AJ
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Jun; 53(7):1025-32. PubMed ID: 25539513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement uncertainty and metrological traceability of whole blood cyclosporin A mass concentration results obtained by UHPLC-MS/MS.
    Rigo-Bonnin R; Alía P; Canalias F
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2018 Aug; 56(9):1458-1468. PubMed ID: 29688884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compromise in uncertainty estimation by modelling and validation approaches for an HPLC-UV method for measurement of biochemical indicators of vitamins A and E.
    Djellouli O; Rozet E; Dahmani B; Hubert P
    Analyst; 2018 Mar; 143(6):1492-1501. PubMed ID: 29488516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Improving Analytical Methods by Uncertainty Evaluation with the Case of Determination of Aluminum in Starch Products by ICP-MS].
    Gao RF; Gao MC; Ling R; Zhang N
    Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2016 Apr; 36(4):1211-6. PubMed ID: 30052349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental approaches for the estimation of uncertainty in analysis of trace inorganic contaminants in foodstuffs by ICP-MS.
    Coelho I; Gueifão S; Matos AS; Roe M; Castanheira I
    Food Chem; 2013 Nov; 141(1):604-11. PubMed ID: 23768400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How well can radiance reflected from the ocean-atmosphere system be predicted from measurements at the sea surface?
    Gordon HR; Zhang T
    Appl Opt; 1996 Nov; 35(33):6527-43. PubMed ID: 21127677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Segmented regression with errors in predictors: semi-parametric and parametric methods.
    Küchenhoff H; Carroll RJ
    Stat Med; 1997 Jan 15-Feb 15; 16(1-3):169-88. PubMed ID: 9004390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uncertainty evaluation in the chloroquine phosphate potentiometric titration: application of three different approaches.
    Rodomonte AL; Montinaro A; Bartolomei M
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2006 Sep; 42(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 16870384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of multiple error sources on the calibration uncertainty.
    Badocco D; Lavagnini I; Mondin A; Pastore P
    Food Chem; 2015 Jun; 177():147-51. PubMed ID: 25660870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modelling uncertainty estimation for the determination of aflatoxin M(1) in milk by visual and densitometric thin-layer chromatography with immunoaffinity column clean-up.
    Carvalho KL; Gonçalves GA; Lopes AL; Santos EA; Vargas EA; Magalhães WF
    Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2012; 29(4):679-93. PubMed ID: 22304224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Least squares in calibration: dealing with uncertainty in x.
    Tellinghuisen J
    Analyst; 2010 Aug; 135(8):1961-9. PubMed ID: 20577693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncertainty quantification of the effect of cardiac position variability in the inverse problem of electrocardiographic imaging.
    Bergquist JA; Zenger B; Rupp LC; Busatto A; Tate J; Brooks DH; Narayan A; MacLeod RS
    Physiol Meas; 2023 Oct; 44(10):. PubMed ID: 37734339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uncertainty in liquid chromatographic analysis of pharmaceutical product: influence of various uncertainty sources.
    Leito S; Mölder K; Künnapas A; Herodes K; Leito I
    J Chromatogr A; 2006 Jul; 1121(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 16756985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regression calibration for models with two predictor variables measured with error and their interaction, using instrumental variables and longitudinal data.
    Strand M; Sillau S; Grunwald GK; Rabinovitch N
    Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(3):470-87. PubMed ID: 23901041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Bayesian approach for estimating calibration curves and unknown concentrations in immunoassays.
    Feng F; Sales AP; Kepler TB
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Mar; 27(5):707-12. PubMed ID: 21149344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spreadsheet for designing valid least-squares calibrations: A tutorial.
    Bettencourt da Silva RJ
    Talanta; 2016 Feb; 148():177-90. PubMed ID: 26653439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling energy balance while correcting for measurement error via free knot splines.
    Ries D; Carriquiry A; Shook R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201892. PubMed ID: 30161152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A study of the effect of measurement error in predictor variables in nondestructive assay.
    Burr TL; Knepper PL
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2000 Oct; 53(4-5):547-55. PubMed ID: 11003490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.