474 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26698836)
1. Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP.
van den Berg S; Calus MP; Meuwissen TH; Wientjes YC
BMC Genet; 2015 Dec; 16():146. PubMed ID: 26698836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of QTL properties on the accuracy of multi-breed genomic prediction.
Wientjes YC; Calus MP; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 May; 47(1):42. PubMed ID: 25951906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using selection index theory to estimate consistency of multi-locus linkage disequilibrium across populations.
Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Calus MP
BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 26187501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multibreed genomic prediction using multitrait genomic residual maximum likelihood and multitask Bayesian variable selection.
Calus MPL; Goddard ME; Wientjes YCJ; Bowman PJ; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2018 May; 101(5):4279-4294. PubMed ID: 29550121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population.
Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved precision of QTL mapping using a nonlinear Bayesian method in a multi-breed population leads to greater accuracy of across-breed genomic predictions.
Kemper KE; Reich CM; Bowman PJ; Vander Jagt CJ; Chamberlain AJ; Mason BA; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):29. PubMed ID: 25887988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Random forest estimation of genomic breeding values for disease susceptibility over different disease incidences and genomic architectures in simulated cow calibration groups.
Naderi S; Yin T; König S
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Sep; 99(9):7261-7273. PubMed ID: 27344385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic Prediction Using Multi-trait Weighted GBLUP Accounting for Heterogeneous Variances and Covariances Across the Genome.
Karaman E; Lund MS; Anche MT; Janss L; Su G
G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Nov; 8(11):3549-3558. PubMed ID: 30194089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of QTL minor allele frequency on genomic evaluation using real genotype data and simulated phenotypes in Japanese Black cattle.
Uemoto Y; Sasaki S; Kojima T; Sugimoto Y; Watanabe T
BMC Genet; 2015 Nov; 16():134. PubMed ID: 26586567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multi-population genomic prediction using a multi-task Bayesian learning model.
Chen L; Li C; Miller S; Schenkel F
BMC Genet; 2014 May; 15():53. PubMed ID: 24884927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Bayesian models to estimate direct genomic values in multi-breed commercial beef cattle.
Rolf MM; Garrick DJ; Fountain T; Ramey HR; Weaber RL; Decker JE; Pollak EJ; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):23. PubMed ID: 25884158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method reflecting the degree of linkage disequilibrium.
Nishio M; Satoh M
J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Oct; 132(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 25866073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation.
Clark SA; Hickey JM; van der Werf JH
Genet Sel Evol; 2011 May; 43(1):18. PubMed ID: 21575265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving accuracy of genomic prediction by genetic architecture based priors in a Bayesian model.
Gao N; Li J; He J; Xiao G; Luo Y; Zhang H; Chen Z; Zhang Z
BMC Genet; 2015 Oct; 16():120. PubMed ID: 26466667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the use of whole-genome sequence data for across-breed genomic prediction and fine-scale mapping of QTL.
Meuwissen T; van den Berg I; Goddard M
Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Feb; 53(1):19. PubMed ID: 33637049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
