These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26699099)
1. Comparison of three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis in surgically proven Müllerian duct anomaly cases. Ergenoglu AM; Sahin Ç; Şimşek D; Akdemir A; Yeniel AÖ; Yerli H; Sendag F Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Feb; 197():22-6. PubMed ID: 26699099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of pelvic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging as diagnostic studies for müllerian tract abnormalities. Letterie GS; Haggerty M; Lindee G Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1995; 40(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 7749433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging. Bermejo C; Martínez Ten P; Cantarero R; Diaz D; Pérez Pedregosa J; Barrón E; Labrador E; Ruiz López L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 35(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 20052665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract. Graupera B; Pascual MA; Hereter L; Browne JL; Úbeda B; Rodríguez I; Pedrero C Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 46(5):616-22. PubMed ID: 25690307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cervix and vagina in women with uterine malformations. Bermejo C; Martínez-Ten P; Recio M; Ruiz-López L; Díaz D; Illescas T Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 43(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 23754235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using 3D MRI can potentially enhance the ability of trained surgeons to more precisely diagnose Mullerian duct anomalies compared to MR alone. Pan HX; Liu P; Duan H; Li PF; Chen RL; Tang L; Luo GN; Chen CL Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Sep; 228():313-318. PubMed ID: 30075412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical significance of 3D ultrasound compared to MRI in uterine malformations. Imboden S; Müller M; Raio L; Mueller MD; Tutschek B Ultraschall Med; 2014 Oct; 35(5):440-4. PubMed ID: 24557634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of septate and bicornuate uterus compared with office hysteroscopy and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. Faivre E; Fernandez H; Deffieux X; Gervaise A; Frydman R; Levaillant JM J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 22014544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies and its concordance with magnetic resonance imaging. Cekdemir YE; Mutlu U; Acar D; Altay C; Secil M; Dogan OE J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Jan; 42(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 33938374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combined laparoscopic and hysteroscopic approach for the treatment of a hybrid Müllerian duct anomaly: a case report. Lima M; Cantone N; Destro F; Ruggeri G J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2013 Nov; 23(11):960-4. PubMed ID: 23968251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Magnetic resonance in the evaluation of Mullerian duct anomalies]. Fischetti SG; Politi G; Lomeo E; Garozzo G Radiol Med; 1995; 89(1-2):105-11. PubMed ID: 7716288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic imaging modalities for Müllerian anomalies: the case for a new gold standard. Berger A; Batzer F; Lev-Toaff A; Berry-Roberts C J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):335-45. PubMed ID: 24246880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies. Ghi T; Casadio P; Kuleva M; Perrone AM; Savelli L; Giunchi S; Meriggiola MC; Gubbini G; Pilu G; Pelusi C; Pelusi G Fertil Steril; 2009 Aug; 92(2):808-13. PubMed ID: 18692833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging of mullerian duct anomalies of the uterus. Troiano RN Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Aug; 14(4):269-79. PubMed ID: 14578774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advanced Imaging for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Coexistent Renal and Müllerian Abnormalities. Coleman AD; Arbuckle JL Curr Urol Rep; 2018 Sep; 19(11):89. PubMed ID: 30191416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of real-time 3D sonography in the diagnosis of congenital Mullerian anomalies in high-risk patients with respect to the phase of the menstrual cycle. Caliskan E; Ozkan S; Cakiroglu Y; Sarisoy HT; Corakci A; Ozeren S J Clin Ultrasound; 2010; 38(3):123-7. PubMed ID: 20091695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The utility of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging versus surgery for the characterization of müllerian anomalies in the pediatric and adolescent population. Santos XM; Krishnamurthy R; Bercaw-Pratt JL; Dietrich JE J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 25(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 22357190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Müllerian duct anomalies: comparison of MRI diagnosis and clinical diagnosis. Mueller GC; Hussain HK; Smith YR; Quint EH; Carlos RC; Johnson TD; DeLancey JO AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1294-302. PubMed ID: 18029861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]