These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Pattern commonality in the facial orientation of the occlusal region: form-functional significance and clinical potentiality. Zingeser MR Am J Orthod; 1974 Nov; 66(5):516-37. PubMed ID: 4621249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Cephalometric study of 253 cases of neutrocclusion and the dynamics of suborbital face height and mid-face height]. Roth R Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1982 Aug; 43(4):282-94. PubMed ID: 6985216 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of facial form. Eastwood AW Dent Clin North Am; 1978 Oct; 22(4):539-55. PubMed ID: 279476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Statistical analysis of the correlation of the soft tissue profile on the skeletal and dental elements using the Neger angle]. Roth R; Rutz A; Schnieper R Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1981; 13(3):199-216. PubMed ID: 6946966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Beyond roentgenographic cephalometry--what? Moss ML Am J Orthod; 1983 Jul; 84(1):77-9. PubMed ID: 6575619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Preadenoid space size and its relationship to the vertical facial type. Gomez CE; Gomez LC; Chacon JA World J Orthod; 2006; 7(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 16548308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of various facial and occlusal characteristics in mature individuals, with vertical and horizontal growth direction expressed at the chin. Lundström A; Woodside DG Eur J Orthod; 1981; 3(4):227-35. PubMed ID: 6945992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Individualized evaluation of facial form. Fishman LS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 May; 111(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 9155810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A study on the relation between the T.M.J. and the cranio-facial form of normal occlusion using roentgenographic cephalometry]. Takimoto M Shigaku; 1982 Oct; 70(3):492-510. PubMed ID: 6964854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of dentoskeletal parameters in Senegalese subjects using orthodontic architectural analysis. Diouf JS; Badiane A; Ngom PI; Diop-Ba K; Diagne F; Crocquet M; Danguy M Int Orthod; 2011 Jun; 9(2):235-47. PubMed ID: 21549655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Correlations between the volume of the sinuses and the facial bones and parameters of 3D cephalometry]. Dah-Jouonzo H; Baron P; Faure J Orthod Fr; 2007 Dec; 78(4):265-81. PubMed ID: 18082117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cephalometric analysis of Enlow's "counterparts": personal contribution and critical observations]. Tollaro I Mondo Ortod; 1981; 6(2):18-29. PubMed ID: 6949027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Smile analysis in different facial patterns and its correlation with underlying hard tissues. Grover N; Kapoor DN; Verma S; Bharadwaj P Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():28. PubMed ID: 26341345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Upper facial mass and aging. A radio-anatomical study]. Laude M; Doual JM; Doual-Bisser M Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 1987; 30(3-4):155-65. PubMed ID: 3479198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical indications for altering vertical dimension of occlusion. Functional and biologic considerations for reconstruction of the dental occlusion. Harper RP Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 11203936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]