These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26699467)

  • 1. Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups.
    Wixted JT; Mickes L; Dunn JC; Clark SE; Wells W
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jan; 113(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 26699467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure.
    Wells GL; Steblay NK; Dysart JE
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24933175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eyewitness confidence in simultaneous and sequential lineups: a criterion shift account for sequential mistaken identification overconfidence.
    Dobolyi DG; Dodson CS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Dec; 19(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 24188335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: computer-based lineup administration.
    MacLin OH; Zimmerman LA; Malpass RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 15965630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model.
    Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6290. PubMed ID: 37072473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis.
    Wixted JT; Wells GL
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2017 May; 18(1):10-65. PubMed ID: 28395650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Active exploration of faces in police lineups increases discrimination accuracy.
    Colloff MF; Flowe HD; Smith HMJ; Seale-Carlisle TM; Meissner CA; Rockey JC; Pande B; Kujur P; Parveen N; Chandel P; Singh MM; Pradhan S; Parganiha A
    Am Psychol; 2022; 77(2):196-220. PubMed ID: 34793182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Wright DB
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eyewitness identification in simultaneous and sequential lineups: an investigation of position effects using receiver operating characteristics.
    Meisters J; Diedenhofen B; Musch J
    Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1297-1309. PubMed ID: 29676666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups.
    Lee J; Penrod SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhancing lineup identification accuracy: two codes are better than one.
    Melara RD; DeWitt-Rickards TS; O'Brien TP
    J Appl Psychol; 1989 Oct; 74(5):706-13. PubMed ID: 2793771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital Detectives: Websleuthing Reduces Eyewitness Identification Accuracy in Police Lineups.
    Elphick C; Philpot R; Zhang M; Stuart A; Pike G; Strathie A; Havard C; Walkington Z; Frumkin LA; Levine M; Price BA; Bandara AK; Nuseibeh B
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():640513. PubMed ID: 33935892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PC_Eyewitness: evaluating the New Jersey method.
    MacLin OH; Phelan CM
    Behav Res Methods; 2007 May; 39(2):242-7. PubMed ID: 17695351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the proportion of guilty suspects and posterior probability of guilt in lineups using signal-detection models.
    Cohen AL; Starns JJ; Rotello CM; Cataldo AM
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 May; 5(1):21. PubMed ID: 32405927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eyewitness confidence and decision time reflect identification accuracy in actual police lineups.
    Quigley-McBride A; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 36757968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Designing police lineups to maximize memory performance.
    Seale-Carlisle TM; Wetmore SA; Flowe HD; Mickes L
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Sep; 25(3):410-430. PubMed ID: 31094561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison.
    Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Oct; 25(5):459-73. PubMed ID: 11688368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eyewitness decisions in simultaneous and sequential lineups: a dual-process signal detection theory analysis.
    Meissner CA; Tredoux CG; Parker JF; MacLin OH
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Jul; 33(5):783-92. PubMed ID: 16383167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The reveal procedure: A way to enhance evidence of innocence from police lineups.
    Yilmaz AS; Lebensfeld TC; Wilson BM
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):164-173. PubMed ID: 35084905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimizing the selection of fillers in police lineups.
    Colloff MF; Wilson BM; Seale-Carlisle TM; Wixted JT
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(8):. PubMed ID: 33593908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.