212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26699561)
1. The impact of CT scan energy on range calculation in proton therapy planning.
Grantham KK; Li H; Zhao T; Klein EE
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):100-109. PubMed ID: 26699561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility of MRI-only treatment planning for proton therapy in brain and prostate cancers: Dose calculation accuracy in substitute CT images.
Koivula L; Wee L; Korhonen J
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4634. PubMed ID: 27487880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric feasibility of cone-beam CT-based treatment planning compared to CT-based treatment planning.
Yoo S; Yin FF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Dec; 66(5):1553-61. PubMed ID: 17056197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Commissioning an in-room mobile CT for adaptive proton therapy with a compact proton system.
Oliver JA; Zeidan O; Meeks SL; Shah AP; Pukala J; Kelly P; Ramakrishna NR; Willoughby TR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):149-158. PubMed ID: 29682879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Initial implementation of the conversion from the energy-subtracted CT number to electron density in tissue inhomogeneity corrections: an anthropomorphic phantom study of radiotherapy treatment planning.
Tsukihara M; Noto Y; Sasamoto R; Hayakawa T; Saito M
Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1378-88. PubMed ID: 25735292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning.
Zhu J; Penfold SN
Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 27277033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the impact of extended field-of-view CT reconstructions on CT values and dosimetric accuracy for radiation therapy.
Cheung JP; Shugard E; Mistry N; Pouliot J; Chen J
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):892-901. PubMed ID: 30457170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical assessment of proton treatment plans under setup and range uncertainties.
Park PC; Cheung JP; Zhu XR; Lee AK; Sahoo N; Tucker SL; Liu W; Li H; Mohan R; Court LE; Dong L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Aug; 86(5):1007-13. PubMed ID: 23688812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of an energy independent CT reconstruction algorithm for use in radiotherapy treatment planning.
Tulip R; Manolopoulos S; Richmond N; Walker C
Br J Radiol; 2023 Dec; 96(1152):20230004. PubMed ID: 37751165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of non-standard CT conversion ramps for Monte Carlo verification of 6 MV prostate IMRT plans.
Zarza-Moreno M; Cardoso I; Teixeira N; Jesus AP; Mora G
Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 22677401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam CT (CBCT)-based dose calculation.
Yang Y; Schreibmann E; Li T; Wang C; Xing L
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):685-705. PubMed ID: 17228114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using CBCT for pretreatment range check in proton therapy: a phantom study for prostate treatment by anterior-posterior beam.
Bentefour el H; Both S; Tang S; Lu HM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):472–483. PubMed ID: 26699545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fluence-modulated proton CT optimized with patient-specific dose and variance objectives for proton dose calculation.
Dickmann J; Kamp F; Hillbrand M; Corradini S; Belka C; Schulte RW; Parodi K; Dedes G; Landry G
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):064001. PubMed ID: 33545701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Anatomic Changes on Pencil Beam Scanned Proton Dose Distributions for Cranial and Extracranial Tumors.
Placidi L; Bolsi A; Lomax AJ; Schneider RA; Malyapa R; Weber DC; Albertini F
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Mar; 97(3):616-623. PubMed ID: 28011049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technical Note: Evaluation of a 160-mm/256-row CT scanner for whole-heart quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.
So A; Imai Y; Nett B; Jackson J; Nett L; Hsieh J; Wisenberg G; Teefy P; Yadegari A; Islam A; Lee TY
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4821. PubMed ID: 27487900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proton dose calculation on scatter-corrected CBCT image: Feasibility study for adaptive proton therapy.
Park YK; Sharp GC; Phillips J; Winey BA
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4449-59. PubMed ID: 26233175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of a contrast agent on proton beam range in radiotherapy planning using computed tomography for patients with locoregionally advanced lung cancer.
Hwang UJ; Shin DH; Kim TH; Moon SH; Lim YK; Jeong H; Rah JE; Kim SS; Kim JY; Kim DY; Park SY; Cho KH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Nov; 81(4):e317-24. PubMed ID: 21497456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proton dose calculation based on converting dual-energy CT data to stopping power ratio (DEEDZ-SPR): a beam-hardening assessment.
Tanaka S; Noto Y; Utsunomiya S; Yoshimura T; Matsuura T; Saito M
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(23):235046. PubMed ID: 33336651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
