These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26699570)

  • 21. Performance evaluation of diagnostic radiology dosimeters in clinical and calibration x-ray beams.
    Hourdakis CJ; Boziari A; Manetou A
    Health Phys; 2010 May; 98(5):704-16. PubMed ID: 20386200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Performance of a pencil ionization chamber in various radiation beams.
    Maia AF; Caldas LV
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2003 May; 58(5):595-601. PubMed ID: 12735977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [A Study of uncertainty factors in cross calibration of dosimeter for diagnostic X-rays].
    Yagi H; Kubo H; Oita M; Kuroda T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Jul; 61(7):1006-13. PubMed ID: 16049414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A tunable monochromatic X-ray source for metrological studies in the 1-20 keV energy range: application to the measurement of attenuation coefficients.
    Lépy MC; Ferreux L; Plagnard J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2004; 60(2-4):159-65. PubMed ID: 14987636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Solid-state dosimeters: a new approach for mammography measurements.
    Brateman LF; Heintz PH
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):542-57. PubMed ID: 25652475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Measurement of half-value layer in mammography].
    Yagi H; Kitamura R; Saruwatari R; Doi N; Yamane E
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Jun; 59(6):729-36. PubMed ID: 12881679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols.
    Dance DR; Young KC; van Engen RE
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(14):4361-72. PubMed ID: 19550001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intra-individual comparison of average glandular dose of two digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations.
    Engelken FJ; Meyer H; Juran R; Bick U; Fallenberg E; Diekmann F
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1272-80. PubMed ID: 19632866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dosimetric and image quality comparison of two digital mammography units with different target/filter combinations: Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, W/Rh, W/Ag.
    Emanuelli S; Rizzi E; Amerio S; Fasano C; Cesarani F
    Radiol Med; 2011 Mar; 116(2):310-8. PubMed ID: 21225367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Target-filter combination effects on breast tissue characterization using mammographic X-rays: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Elshemey WM; Saif RA; Elfiky AA
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(4):823-834. PubMed ID: 35599527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dosimetry for small fields in stereotactic radiosurgery using gafchromic MD-V2-55 film, TLD-100 and alanine dosimeters.
    Massillon-J L G; Cueva-Prócel D; Díaz-Aguirre P; Rodríguez-Ponce M; Herrera-Martínez F
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e63418. PubMed ID: 23671677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
    Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long-term stability of radiotherapy dosimeters calibrated at the Polish Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory.
    Ulkowski P; Bulski W; Chełmiński K
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2015 Oct; 104():181-5. PubMed ID: 26183579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative study of the influence of anode and filter materials on primary shielding requirements for mammography.
    Okunade AA
    Health Phys; 2005 Feb; 88(2 Suppl):S44-52. PubMed ID: 15654245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Estimation of personal dose based on the dependent calibration of personal dosimeters in interventional radiology].
    Mori H; Koshida K; Ichikawa K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Aug; 63(8):852-61. PubMed ID: 17917349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Characteristics of a tandem system of ionization chambers in X-ray beams, mammography level.
    Afonso LC; Vivolo V; Caldas LV
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2010; 68(4-5):610-3. PubMed ID: 19910201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Characterization of MOSFET dosimeter angular dependence in three rotational axes measured free-in-air and in soft-tissue equivalent material.
    Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Wolff J; Kortesniemi M
    J Radiat Res; 2013 Sep; 54(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 23520268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Meaningful Data or Just Measurements? Differences Between Ionization Chamber and Solid-State Detectors.
    Brateman LF; Heintz PH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Sep; 12(9):951-3. PubMed ID: 26355204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of angular free-in-air and tissue-equivalent phantom response measurements in p-MOSFET dosimeters.
    Pomije BD; Huh CH; Tressler MA; Hintenlang DE; Bolch WE
    Health Phys; 2001 May; 80(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 11316081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of non-contact semiconductor X-ray analyzer for quality assurance in intraoral radiography: a comparison with ionization chamber dosimeter.
    Nouchi S; Yoshida H; Miki Y; Tezuka Y; Ogawa R; Ogura I
    Oral Radiol; 2023 Oct; 39(4):766-770. PubMed ID: 37318742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.