These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26699570)

  • 41. Computation of beam quality parameters for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, Rh/Rh, and W/Al target/filter combinations in mammography.
    Kharrati H; Zarrad B
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2638-42. PubMed ID: 14596300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion coefficients for dose estimation in mammography based on a 3D detailed breast model.
    Wang W; Qiu R; Ren L; Liu H; Wu Z; Li C; Niu Y; Li J
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2503-2514. PubMed ID: 28295395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. DEVELOPMENT OF AN IONIZATION CHAMBER FOR LOW AND MEDIUM ENERGY PHOTON DOSIMETRY.
    Singh SK; Kulkarni MS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(2):215-220. PubMed ID: 29660104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [A Study on the Uncertainty of the Average Glandular Dose in Quality Control of Mammographic X-ray Units].
    Takizawa T; Sekimoto M; Kodama N
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2024 Jul; 80(7):721-730. PubMed ID: 38811193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Development of improved free-air ionisation chamber as absolute dosimetry standard for low-energy X rays in INER.
    Chu CH; Kuan WP; Kurosawa T; Lin UT; Chen IJ; Chen WL
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Feb; 138(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 19789201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Using NanoDot dosimetry to study the RS 2000 X-ray biological irradiator.
    Lu L; Bondra K; Gupta N; Sommerfeld J; Chronowski C; Leasure J; Singh M; Pelloski CE
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2013 Dec; 89(12):1094-9. PubMed ID: 23786571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Calibration of a scintillation dosemeter for beta rays using an extrapolation ionization chamber.
    Hakanen AT; Sipilä PM; Kosunen A
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1123-7. PubMed ID: 15191300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Contrast and dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh, and Rh-Rh target-filter combinations in mammography.
    Gingold EL; Wu X; Barnes GT
    Radiology; 1995 Jun; 195(3):639-44. PubMed ID: 7753987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [National Dose Standards for X-ray Diagnostics and Calibration of Dosemeters].
    Saito N; Tanaka T; Kurosawa T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Dec; 71(12):1251-8. PubMed ID: 26685838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. X-ray spectroscopy in mammography with a silicon PIN photodiode with application to the measurement of tube voltage.
    Künzel R; Herdade SB; Terini RA; Costa PR
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2996-3003. PubMed ID: 15587652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Radiation dose reduction for augmentation mammography.
    Smathers RL; Boone JM; Lee LJ; Berns EA; Miller RA; Wright AM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 May; 188(5):1414-21. PubMed ID: 17449790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Microdosimetric characterisation of 28 kVp Mo/Mo, Rh/Rh, Rh/Al, W/Rh and Mo/Rh mammography X ray spectra.
    Verhaegen F; Castellano IA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 99(1-4):393-6. PubMed ID: 12194338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Short communication: kilovoltage measurement with rhodium target and filters on mammography X-ray machines.
    Underwood AC; Law J; Goodman DA; Robinson A; Rust A
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Aug; 69(824):769-73. PubMed ID: 8949681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A special ionisation chamber for quality control of diagnostic and mammography X ray equipment.
    Costa AM; Caldas LV
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 104(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 12862242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Variable transformation of calibration equations for radiation dosimetry.
    Watanabe Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(6):1221-34. PubMed ID: 15798318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Patient dose in digital mammography.
    Chevalier M; Morán P; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Cepeda T; Vañó E
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2471-9. PubMed ID: 15487727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Investigation of single-shot beam quality measurements using state of the art solid-state dosimeters for routine quality assurance applications in mammography.
    Bemelmans F; Marshall NW; Dedulle A; Tri Wigati K; Ivanovic S; Binst J; Struelens L; De Hauwere A; Devillers M; Bosmans H
    Phys Med; 2021 Aug; 88():242-249. PubMed ID: 34311162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Variations in dose response with x-ray energy of LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescence dosimeters: implications for clinical dosimetry.
    Duggan L; Hood C; Warren-Forward H; Haque M; Kron T
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(17):3831-45. PubMed ID: 15470908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A chamber for determining the conventionally true value of Hp(10) and H*(10) needed by calibration laboratories.
    Ankerhold U; Ambrosi P; Eberle T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 96(1-3):133-7. PubMed ID: 11586717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The relationship between the attenuation properties of breast microcalcifications and aluminum.
    Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Marshall N; Meylaers T; Michielsen K; Marchal G; Bosmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1057-68. PubMed ID: 20090185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.