These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26699573)

  • 1. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus proton radiotherapy versus carbon ion radiotherapy for spinal bone metastases: a treatment planning study.
    Rief H; Chaudhri N; Tonndorf-Martini E; Bruckner T; Rieken S; Bostel T; Förster R; Schlampp I; Debus J; Sterzing F
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):186–194. PubMed ID: 26699573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus conventional intensity modulated radiation therapy for stereotactic spine radiotherapy: a planning study and early clinical data.
    Kuijper IT; Dahele M; Senan S; Verbakel WF
    Radiother Oncol; 2010 Feb; 94(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 20122745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protons offer reduced normal-tissue exposure for patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy for resected pancreatic head cancer.
    Nichols RC; Huh SN; Prado KL; Yi BY; Sharma NK; Ho MW; Hoppe BS; Mendenhall NP; Li Z; Regine WF
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 May; 83(1):158-63. PubMed ID: 22245197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Volumetric arc intensity-modulated therapy for spine body radiotherapy: comparison with static intensity-modulated treatment.
    Wu QJ; Yoo S; Kirkpatrick JP; Thongphiew D; Yin FF
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Dec; 75(5):1596-604. PubMed ID: 19733447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment Planning Comparison for Carbon Ion Radiotherapy, Proton Therapy and Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Spinal Sarcoma.
    Matsumoto K; Nakamura K; Shioyama Y; Sasaki T; Ohga S; Yamaguchi T; Yoshitake T; Asai K; Kakiuchi G; Honda H
    Anticancer Res; 2015 Jul; 35(7):4083-9. PubMed ID: 26124359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
    Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
    Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of spinal Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) planning techniques: intensity-modulated radiation therapy, modulated arc therapy, and helical tomotherapy.
    Kim J; Jang HS; Kim YS; Choi BO; Kang YN
    Med Dosim; 2017 Autumn; 42(3):210-215. PubMed ID: 28526192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: a dosimetric and treatment efficiency comparison between volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy.
    Ma Y; Li M; Yin Y; Kong L; Sun X; Lin X; Yu J
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Oct; 9(5):499-507. PubMed ID: 20815421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiotherapy for early mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma according to the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG): the roles of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and involved-node radiotherapy.
    Koeck J; Abo-Madyan Y; Lohr F; Stieler F; Kriz J; Mueller RP; Wenz F; Eich HT
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 May; 83(1):268-76. PubMed ID: 22079733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In silico comparison of the dosimetric impacts of a greater omentum spacer for abdominal and pelvic tumors in carbon-ion, proton and photon radiotherapy.
    Yamada M; Sato H; Ieko Y; Miyasaka Y; Kanai T; Yano N; Ono T; Akamatsu H; Harada M; Ichikawa M; Teranishi Y; Kikuchi Y; Nemoto K
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 Nov; 14(1):207. PubMed ID: 31752932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
    Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
    Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dosimetric evaluation of 4 different treatment modalities for curative-intent stereotactic body radiation therapy for isolated thoracic spinal metastases.
    Yang J; Ma L; Wang XS; Xu WX; Cong XH; Xu SP; Ju ZJ; Du L; Cai BN; Yang J
    Med Dosim; 2016; 41(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 26831753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment planning study to determine potential benefit of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conformal radiotherapy for unresectable hepatic malignancies.
    Eccles CL; Bissonnette JP; Craig T; Taremi M; Wu X; Dawson LA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Oct; 72(2):582-8. PubMed ID: 18793961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intensity-modulated proton therapy reduces the dose to normal tissue compared with intensity-modulated radiation therapy or passive scattering proton therapy and enables individualized radical radiotherapy for extensive stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer: a virtual clinical study.
    Zhang X; Li Y; Pan X; Xiaoqiang L; Mohan R; Komaki R; Cox JD; Chang JY
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Jun; 77(2):357-66. PubMed ID: 19660879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment planning and delivery evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy for stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal tumours: impact of arc discretization in planning system.
    Marchand EL; Sahgal A; Zhang TJ; Millar BA; Sharpe M; Moseley D; Letourneau D
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Dec; 11(6):599-606. PubMed ID: 22712602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of heart and coronary artery doses associated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for distal esophageal cancer.
    Kole TP; Aghayere O; Kwah J; Yorke ED; Goodman KA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Aug; 83(5):1580-6. PubMed ID: 22284687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of three-dimensional (3D) conformal proton radiotherapy (RT), 3D conformal photon RT, and intensity-modulated RT for retroperitoneal and intra-abdominal sarcomas.
    Swanson EL; Indelicato DJ; Louis D; Flampouri S; Li Z; Morris CG; Paryani N; Slopsema R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Aug; 83(5):1549-57. PubMed ID: 22270176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: an IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors.
    Hein PA; Gladstone DJ; Bellerive MR; Hug EB
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 16029816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of deliverable IMRT and VMAT for spine metastases using a simultaneous integrated boost.
    Lee YK; Bedford JL; McNair HA; Hawkins MA
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 86(1022):20120466. PubMed ID: 23385999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Split-volume treatment planning of multiple consecutive vertebral body metastases for cyberknife image-guided robotic radiosurgery.
    Sahgal A; Chuang C; Larson D; Huang K; Petti P; Weinstein P; Ma L
    Med Dosim; 2008; 33(3):175-9. PubMed ID: 18674681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.