These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26700055)

  • 1. Interpretation of Quantitative Shotgun Proteomic Data.
    Aasebø E; Berven FS; Selheim F; Barsnes H; Vaudel M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1394():261-273. PubMed ID: 26700055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bioinformatics Methods to Deduce Biological Interpretation from Proteomics Data.
    Patel K; Singh M; Gowda H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1549():147-161. PubMed ID: 27975290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visualization, Inspection and Interpretation of Shotgun Proteomics Identification Results.
    Lereim RR; Oveland E; Berven FS; Vaudel M; Barsnes H
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 919():227-235. PubMed ID: 27975220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mass Spectrometry-Based Protein Quantification.
    Chen Y; Wang F; Xu F; Yang T
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 919():255-279. PubMed ID: 27975224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data.
    Tyanova S; Temu T; Sinitcyn P; Carlson A; Hein MY; Geiger T; Mann M; Cox J
    Nat Methods; 2016 Sep; 13(9):731-40. PubMed ID: 27348712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics.
    Tyanova S; Temu T; Cox J
    Nat Protoc; 2016 Dec; 11(12):2301-2319. PubMed ID: 27809316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Platforms and Pipelines for Proteomics Data Analysis and Management.
    Codrea MC; Nahnsen S
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 919():203-215. PubMed ID: 27975218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expanding the Perseus Software for Omics Data Analysis With Custom Plugins.
    Yu SH; Ferretti D; Schessner JP; Rudolph JD; Borner GHH; Cox J
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2020 Sep; 71(1):e105. PubMed ID: 32931150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Global quantitative proteomics using spectral counting: an inexpensive experimental and bioinformatics workflow for deep proteome coverage.
    Balbuena TS; Demartini DR; Thelen JJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1072():171-83. PubMed ID: 24136522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computational and Statistical Methods for High-Throughput Mass Spectrometry-Based PTM Analysis.
    Schwämmle V; Vaudel M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1558():437-458. PubMed ID: 28150251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. TMT One-Stop Shop: From Reliable Sample Preparation to Computational Analysis Platform.
    Mirzaei M; Pascovici D; Wu JX; Chick J; Wu Y; Cooke B; Haynes P; Molloy MP
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1549():45-66. PubMed ID: 27975283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Network Module for the Perseus Software for Computational Proteomics Facilitates Proteome Interaction Graph Analysis.
    Rudolph JD; Cox J
    J Proteome Res; 2019 May; 18(5):2052-2064. PubMed ID: 30931570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MaxQuant for in-depth analysis of large SILAC datasets.
    Tyanova S; Mann M; Cox J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1188():351-64. PubMed ID: 25059623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elective affinities--bioinformatic analysis of proteomic mass spectrometry data.
    Li X; Pizarro A; Grosser T
    Arch Physiol Biochem; 2009 Dec; 115(5):311-9. PubMed ID: 19911947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From proteome lists to biological impact--tools and strategies for the analysis of large MS data sets.
    Malik R; Dulla K; Nigg EA; Körner R
    Proteomics; 2010 Mar; 10(6):1270-83. PubMed ID: 20077408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rover: a tool to visualize and validate quantitative proteomics data from different sources.
    Colaert N; Helsens K; Impens F; Vandekerckhove J; Gevaert K
    Proteomics; 2010 Mar; 10(6):1226-9. PubMed ID: 20058247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Different Research Approaches in Unraveling the Venom Proteome of
    Hus KK; Marczak Ł; Petrilla V; Petrillová M; Legáth J; Bocian A
    Biomolecules; 2020 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 32899462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EBprot: Statistical analysis of labeling-based quantitative proteomics data.
    Koh HW; Swa HL; Fermin D; Ler SG; Gunaratne J; Choi H
    Proteomics; 2015 Aug; 15(15):2580-91. PubMed ID: 25913743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Qupe--a Rich Internet Application to take a step forward in the analysis of mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics experiments.
    Albaum SP; Neuweger H; Fränzel B; Lange S; Mertens D; Trötschel C; Wolters D; Kalinowski J; Nattkemper TW; Goesmann A
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Dec; 25(23):3128-34. PubMed ID: 19808875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PRIDE: the proteomics identifications database.
    Martens L; Hermjakob H; Jones P; Adamski M; Taylor C; States D; Gevaert K; Vandekerckhove J; Apweiler R
    Proteomics; 2005 Aug; 5(13):3537-45. PubMed ID: 16041671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.