1901 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26700992)
1. Application of the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool to predict need for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning in postmenopausal women.
Chao AS; Chen FP; Lin YC; Huang TS; Fan CM; Yu YW
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 54(6):722-5. PubMed ID: 26700992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ADDING VFA TO DXA IDENTIFIES FRACTURE RISK IN A WAY NOT DUPLICATED BY OTHER MEASURES.
Ginther JP; Ginther AW; Brodersen LD
Endocr Pract; 2017 Dec; 23(12):1375-1378. PubMed ID: 29019717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vertebral fracture assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry along with bone mineral density in the evaluation of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Shetty S; John B; Mohan S; Paul TV
Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Feb; 15(1):25. PubMed ID: 32095943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Osteoporosis treatment considerations based upon fracture history, fracture risk assessment, vertebral fracture assessment, and bone density in Canada.
Leslie WD; Lix LM; Binkley N
Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Jun; 15(1):93. PubMed ID: 32577922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bone mineral density measurement combined with vertebral fracture assessment increases diagnosis of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.
Cai S; Yu H; Li Y; He X; Yan L; Huang X; Wang P
Skeletal Radiol; 2020 Feb; 49(2):273-280. PubMed ID: 31352490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly women: Chiba bone survey.
Oka R; Ohira M; Suzuki S; Yoshida T; Koide H; Tanaka T; Tatsuno I
Endocr J; 2018 Feb; 65(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 29151451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.
Esmaeilzadeh S; Cesme F; Oral A; Yaliman A; Sindel D
Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preoperative bone health assessment and optimization in spine surgery.
Anderson PA; Kadri A; Hare KJ; Binkley N
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Aug; 49(2):E2. PubMed ID: 32738805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX.
Kälvesten J; Lui LY; Brismar T; Cummings S
Bone; 2016 May; 86():30-5. PubMed ID: 26921822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical risk factor status in patients with vertebral fracture but normal bone mineral density.
Kadri A; Binkley N; Daffner SD; Anderson PA
Spine J; 2022 Oct; 22(10):1634-1641. PubMed ID: 35680015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spine trabecular bone score subsequent to bone mineral density improves fracture discrimination in women.
Krueger D; Fidler E; Libber J; Aubry-Rozier B; Hans D; Binkley N
J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 23769698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool.
Lin J; Yang Y; Fei Q; Zhang X; Ma Z; Wang Q; Li J; Li D; Meng Q; Wang B
Clin Interv Aging; 2016; 11():461-9. PubMed ID: 27217730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®): applications in clinical practice.
Watts NB
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Apr; 20(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 21438699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Underestimated fracture risk in postmenopausal women-application of the hybrid intervention threshold.
Wang Y; Yu S; Hsu C; Tsai C; Cheng T
Osteoporos Int; 2020 Mar; 31(3):475-483. PubMed ID: 31696272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation between osteoporotic fracture risk in Brazilian postmenopausal women calculated using the FRAX with and without the inclusion of bone densitometry data.
Bastos-Silva Y; Aguiar LB; Pinto-Neto AM; Baccaro LF; Costa-Paiva L
Arch Osteoporos; 2016; 11():16. PubMed ID: 27067597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) Results Calculated With and Without Bone Mineral Density Values for the Evaluation of Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women With Osteopenia.
Imerci A; Yalın Kılınç C; Aydogan NH; Karalezli MN; Savran A
J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(4):464-471. PubMed ID: 28781230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement of cortical porosity of the proximal femur improves identification of women with nonvertebral fragility fractures.
Ahmed LA; Shigdel R; Joakimsen RM; Eldevik OP; Eriksen EF; Ghasem-Zadeh A; Bala Y; Zebaze R; Seeman E; Bjørnerem Å
Osteoporos Int; 2015 Aug; 26(8):2137-46. PubMed ID: 25876879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Discordance in lumbar bone mineral density measurements by quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women: a prospective comparative study.
Lin W; He C; Xie F; Chen T; Zheng G; Yin H; Chen H; Wang Z
Spine J; 2023 Feb; 23(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 36343911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women with diabetes: comparison between DeFRA and FRAX tools.
Bonaccorsi G; Messina C; Cervellati C; Maietti E; Medini M; Rossini M; Massari L; Greco P
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2018 May; 34(5):404-408. PubMed ID: 29172781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the fracture risk assessment tool for determining bone disease and the impact of secondary causes of osteoporosis in people living with HIV.
Vizcarra P; Gallego J; Vivancos MJ; Sifuentes WA; Llop M; Casado JL
HIV Res Clin Pract; 2020; 21(2-3):63-71. PubMed ID: 32698706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
