These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26701138)
1. In Vitro Mechanical Analysis of Different Techniques of Internal Fixation of Combined Mandibular Angle and Body Fractures. de Medeiros RC; Sigua EA; Navarro P; Olate S; Albergaria Barbosa JR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 74(4):778-85. PubMed ID: 26701138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative in vitro mechanical evaluation of techniques using a 2.0 mm locking fixation system for simulated fractures of the mandibular body. de Medeiros RC; de Moura AL; Sawazaki R; Fernandes Moreira RW J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 43(3):302-5. PubMed ID: 25573304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fractographic analysis of 2.0-mm plates with a screw locking system in simulated fractures of the mandibular body. de Medeiros RC; Lauria de Moura A; Rodrigues DC; Menezes Mendes MB; Sawazaki R; Fernandes Moreira RW J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 72(6):1130-7. PubMed ID: 24656954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of compressive strength between three different plates for mandibular angle fractures fixation. Negreiros Lyrio MC; Monnazzi MS; De Moraes M; Hochuli-Vieira E; Nunes Reis JM; Pereira-Filho VA J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e277-80. PubMed ID: 24296119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical study in polyurethane mandibles of different metal plates and internal fixation techniques, employed in mandibular angle fractures. Semeghini Guastaldi FP; Hochuli-Vieira E; Guastaldi AC J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):2246-50. PubMed ID: 25340696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques. Asprino L; Consani S; de Moraes M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Mar; 64(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 16487808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical and photoelastic analysis of four different fixation methods for mandibular body fractures. Rodrigues DC; Falci SG; Lauria A; Marchiori ÉC; Moreira RW J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 43(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 25596966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Three Different Osteosynthesis Methods for Mandibular Angle Fractures: Vertical Load Test. Pereira-Filho VA; Oliveira LF; Reis JM; Gabrielli MA; Neto RS; Monnazzi MS J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 27(7):1770-1773. PubMed ID: 27648657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of the mechanical resistance of 2 separate plates and 2 overlaid plates used in the fixation of the mandibular condyle: an in vitro study. Gealh WC; Costa JV; Ferreira GM; Iwaki Filho L J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):738-43. PubMed ID: 19304028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development plates for stable internal fixation: Study of mechanical resistance in simulated fractures of the mandibular condyle. Celegatti Filho TS; Rodrigues DC; Lauria A; Moreira RW; Consani S J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 43(1):158-61. PubMed ID: 25439088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Experimental studies of the biomechanical stability of different miniplate configurations for the mandibular angle]. Schierle HP; Schmelzeisen R; Rahn B Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1996; 41():166-70. PubMed ID: 8755434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery. Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of compression and strength of divergent screws mounted on miniplates for fixation of mandibular fractures: an in vitro experimental study. Jafarian M; Pourdanesh F; Esmaeelinejad M; Dehghani N; Aghdashi F; Tabrizi R Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 53(7):613-7. PubMed ID: 25921364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery. Brasileiro BF; Grotta-Grempel R; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro mechanical test of grid plates for mandibular angle fractures. Pereira-Filho VA; de Oliveira Gorla LF; Dos Santos JC; Monnazzi MS; Dos Santos Nunes Reis JM; de Moraes M; F R Gabrielli M Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 60(8):1125-1130. PubMed ID: 35791983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraoral external oblique ridge compared with transbuccal lateral cortical plate fixation for the treatment of fractures of the mandibular angle: prospective randomised trial. Laverick S; Siddappa P; Wong H; Patel P; Jones DC Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 50(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 22421389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro evaluation of the resistance of a 2.0-mm titanium fixation system in the sectioned angle without continuity of the inferior border of the mandible. Trivellato PF; Pepato AO; Ribeiro MC; Sverzut CE; Trivellato AE Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 May; 43(5):559-63. PubMed ID: 24216298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of in vitro resistance of titanium and resorbable (poly-L-DL-lactic acid) fixation systems on the mandibular angle fracture. Bregagnolo LA; Bertelli PF; Ribeiro MC; Sverzut CE; Trivellato AE Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 21067895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does plate adaptation affect stability? A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates. Haug RH; Street CC; Goltz M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Nov; 60(11):1319-26. PubMed ID: 12420268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]