152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26701839)
1. Species sensitivity distribution for chlorpyrifos to aquatic organisms: Model choice and sample size.
Zhao J; Chen B
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2016 Mar; 125():161-9. PubMed ID: 26701839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Species sensitivity distribution for pentachlorophenol to aquatic organisms based on interval ecotoxicological data.
Zhao J; Zhang R
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2017 Nov; 145():193-199. PubMed ID: 28734222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Species sensitive distribution for aquatic biota exposed to triazophos].
Chen BY; Zheng SR; Niu XC; Zhao JS
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2011 Apr; 32(4):1101-7. PubMed ID: 21717754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Augmenting aquatic species sensitivity distributions with interspecies toxicity estimation models.
Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Jackson CR; Barron MG
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Mar; 33(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 24214839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Setting water quality criteria in China: approaches for developing species sensitivity distributions for metals and metalloids.
Liu Y; Wu F; Mu Y; Feng C; Fang Y; Chen L; Giesy JP
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2014; 230():35-57. PubMed ID: 24609517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multispecies toxicity test for silver nanoparticles to derive hazardous concentration based on species sensitivity distribution for the protection of aquatic ecosystems.
Kwak JI; Cui R; Nam SH; Kim SW; Chae Y; An YJ
Nanotoxicology; 2016; 10(5):521-30. PubMed ID: 26634622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Which distribution to choose for deriving a species sensitivity distribution? Implications from analysis of acute and chronic ecotoxicity data.
Yanagihara M; Hiki K; Iwasaki Y
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2024 Jun; 278():116379. PubMed ID: 38714082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating population-level HC5 for copper using a species sensitivity distribution approach.
Iwasaki Y; Hayashi TI; Kamo M
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Jun; 32(6):1396-402. PubMed ID: 23417717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of vanadium water quality benchmarks for the protection of aquatic life with relevance to the Athabasca Oil Sands region using species sensitivity distributions.
Schiffer S; Liber K
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Nov; 36(11):3034-3044. PubMed ID: 28636253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ecological risk assessment of microcystin-LR in the upstream section of the Haihe River based on a species sensitivity distribution model.
Niu Z; Du L; Li J; Zhang Y; Lv Z
Chemosphere; 2018 Feb; 193():403-411. PubMed ID: 29154115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining species sensitivity distribution (SSD) model and thermodynamic index (exergy) for system-level ecological risk assessment of contaminates in aquatic ecosystems.
He W; Kong X; Qin N; He Q; Liu W; Bai Z; Wang Y; Xu F
Environ Int; 2019 Dec; 133(Pt B):105275. PubMed ID: 31675563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of Interspecies Correlation Estimation (ICE) Models to Derive Water Quality Criteria of Microplastics for Protecting Aquatic Organisms.
Wu J; Zhao X; Gao L; Li Y; Wang D
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Aug; 19(16):. PubMed ID: 36011942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ecological risk assessment of nonylphenol in coastal waters of China based on species sensitivity distribution model.
Gao P; Li Z; Gibson M; Gao H
Chemosphere; 2014 Jun; 104():113-9. PubMed ID: 24268347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relevance of generic and site-specific species sensitivity distributions in the current risk assessment procedures for copper and zinc.
Bossuyt BT; Muyssen BT; Janssen CR
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2005 Feb; 24(2):470-8. PubMed ID: 15720010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deriving the aquatic predicted no-effect concentrations (PNECs) of three chlorophenols for the Taihu Lake, China.
Lei BL; Huang SB; Jin XW; Wang Z
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2010 Dec; 45(14):1823-31. PubMed ID: 20936560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exposure pattern-specific species sensitivity distributions for the ecological risk assessments of insecticides.
Van den Brink PJ; Buijert-de Gelder DM; Brock TCM; Roessink I; Focks A
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Sep; 180():252-258. PubMed ID: 31096128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Better bootstrap estimation of hazardous concentration thresholds for aquatic assemblages.
Grist EP; Leung KM; Wheeler JR; Crane M
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Jul; 21(7):1515-24. PubMed ID: 12109754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A quantitative structure-activity relationships approach to predict the toxicity of narcotic compounds to aquatic communities.
Finizio A; Di Nica V; Rizzi C; Villa S
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2020 Mar; 190():110068. PubMed ID: 31841895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects assessment: boron compounds in the aquatic environment.
Schoderboeck L; Mühlegger S; Losert A; Gausterer C; Hornek R
Chemosphere; 2011 Jan; 82(3):483-7. PubMed ID: 21055789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study of species sensitivity distributions based on non-parametric kernel density estimation for some transition metals.
Wang Y; Feng C; Liu Y; Zhao Y; Li H; Zhao T; Guo W
Environ Pollut; 2017 Feb; 221():343-350. PubMed ID: 27939636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
