800 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26702167)
1. Insanity Defense: Past, Present, and Future.
Math SB; Kumar CN; Moirangthem S
Indian J Psychol Med; 2015; 37(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 26702167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The importance of the patients deemed not guilty by reason of insanity for the psychiatric reform.
Douzenis A
Psychiatriki; 2016; 27(3):165-168. PubMed ID: 27837570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A confusion of tongues: competence, insanity, psychiatry, and the law.
Gutheil TG
Psychiatr Serv; 1999 Jun; 50(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 10375145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Translating clinical findings to the legal norm: the Defendant's Insanity Assessment Support Scale (DIASS).
Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Meynen G; Carabellese F; Ferracuti S
Transl Psychiatry; 2019 Nov; 9(1):278. PubMed ID: 31699969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The civil liability for damages of the criminally insane.
Melamed Y; Ganot N; Mester R; Bleich A
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2008; 45(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 19439834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of a new instrument to guide and support insanity evaluations: the defendant's insanity assessment support scale (DIASS).
Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Roma P; Ferracuti S
Transl Psychiatry; 2022 Mar; 12(1):115. PubMed ID: 35318308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using Technology to Improve the Objectivity of Criminal Responsibility Evaluations.
Vitacco MJ; Gottfried ED; Batastini AB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 29618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8.
Landess JS; Holoyda BJ
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2021 Jun; 49(2):231-240. PubMed ID: 33789990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reshaping Insanity in Pakistani Law: The Case of Safia Bano.
Munir MA; Wright B
Am J Law Med; 2023 Jul; 49(2-3):301-313. PubMed ID: 38344793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal insanity: assessment of the inability to refrain.
Donohue A; Arya V; Fitch L; Hammen D
Psychiatry (Edgmont); 2008 Mar; 5(3):58-66. PubMed ID: 19727300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How does India Decide Insanity Pleas? A Review of High Court Judgments in the Past Decade.
Ramamurthy P; Chathoth V; Thilakan P
Indian J Psychol Med; 2019; 41(2):150-154. PubMed ID: 30983663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neuroscience-based Psychiatric Assessments of Criminal Responsibility: Beyond Self-Report?
Meynen G
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2020 Jul; 29(3):446-458. PubMed ID: 32484135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
Meynen G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mental disorder and legal responsibility: the relevance of stages of decision making.
Kalis A; Meynen G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(6):601-8. PubMed ID: 24694295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identifying factors associated with criminal responsibility by analyzing court trial verdicts.
Shiina A; Sato A; Iyo M; Igarashi Y
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 77():101702. PubMed ID: 33962349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rationality Was Lost on the United States Supreme Court in Its
Felthous AR
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2022 Mar; 50(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 34933935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Arizona's Insanity Defense,
Bloom JD; Kirkorsky SE
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2021 Dec; 49(4):618-622. PubMed ID: 34479941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determining criminal responsibility: How relevant are insight and personal attitudes to mock jurors?
Jung S
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():37-42. PubMed ID: 26294081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
