These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

794 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26702167)

  • 21. When insanity has gone undiscovered by the courts: The practice of the Norwegian Criminal Cases Review Commission in cases of doubts about insanity.
    Grøndahl P; Stridbeck U
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2016 Jul; 26(3):212-24. PubMed ID: 26032297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perceptions of insanity based on occupation of defendant and seriousness of crime.
    McGraw SL; Foley LA
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Feb; 86(1):163-74. PubMed ID: 10778266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rational capacity and criminal responsibility in the USA.
    Felthous AR
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 83():101809. PubMed ID: 35738073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The insanity defense: a difficult necessity.
    McGrath JJ
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Jan; 36(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 3967874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Remodelling criminal insanity: Exploring philosophical, legal, and medical premises of the medical model used in Norwegian law.
    Gröning L; Haukvik UK; Morse SJ; Radovic S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 81():101776. PubMed ID: 35101774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How reliable are forensic evaluations of legal sanity?
    Gowensmith WN; Murrie DC; Boccaccini MT
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Apr; 37(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 22775304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
    Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Premenstrual syndrome as a criminal defense.
    Lewis JW
    Arch Sex Behav; 1990 Oct; 19(5):425-41. PubMed ID: 2260910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Legal insanity and risk: An international perspective on the justification of indeterminate preventive commitment.
    Bijlsma J; Kooijmans T; de Jong F; Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 66():101462. PubMed ID: 31706396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Neuroscience, ethics and legal responsibility: the problem of the insanity defense. Commentary on "The ethics of neuroscience and the neuroscience of ethics: a phenomenological-existential approach".
    Smith SR
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2012 Sep; 18(3):475-81. PubMed ID: 23054669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Frendak to phenis to breivik: an examination of the imposed insanity defense.
    Richie WD; Alam F; Gazula L; Embrack H; Nathani M; Bailey RK
    Front Psychiatry; 2014; 5():172. PubMed ID: 25520672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Analysis of concordance between conclusions of forensic psychiatric evaluation and court decisions after 2005 Criminal Code Amendment in a Taiwan psychiatric hospital.
    Yang TW; Yu JM; Pan CH
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2017; 54():148-154. PubMed ID: 28743408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interface between psychiatry and the law on the issue of murder.
    Bell CC
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1980 Nov; 72(11):1093-7. PubMed ID: 7441789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Beyond competence and sanity: the influence of pretrial evaluation on case disposition.
    Warren JI; Rosenfeld B; Fitch WL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 7841509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: Part IV: The insanity defense and the Ultimate Issue Rule.
    Goldstein RL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 2790225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Residential mental health assessment within Dutch criminal cases: a discussion.
    van der Leij JB; Jackson JL; Malsch M; Nijboer JF
    Behav Sci Law; 2001; 19(5-6):691-702. PubMed ID: 11787076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Toward a culture-bound syndrome-based insanity defense?
    Parzen MD
    Cult Med Psychiatry; 2003 Jun; 27(2):131-55. PubMed ID: 12899464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of causal associations between illness and criminal acts in those who are acquitted by reason of insanity.
    Skeie CA; Rasmussen K
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2015 Feb; 135(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 25707655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Rethinking criminal responsibility: practical application of operational diagnosis and gnostic into expert testimony].
    Okada T
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2005; 107(9):920-35. PubMed ID: 16305187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The insanity verdict, the psychopath, and post-acquittal confinement.
    Halpern AL
    Psychiatr Q; 1992; 63(3):209-43. PubMed ID: 1488463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.