These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26702211)
1. Comparison of ventilatory efficacy and airway dynamics between ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in adult patients during general anesthesia. Kannan S; Harsoor SS; Sowmiya L; Nethra SS; DevikaRani D; Sathesha M J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2015; 31(4):517-21. PubMed ID: 26702211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ProSeal laryngeal mask airway as an alternative to standard endotracheal tube in securing upper airway in the patients undergoing beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting. Shah K Ann Card Anaesth; 2017; 20(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 28074798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway versus Cuffed Endotracheal Tube for Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures under General Anesthesia: A Random Comparative Study. Parikh SS; Parekh SB; Doshi C; Vyas V Anesth Essays Res; 2017; 11(4):958-963. PubMed ID: 29284856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective, randomized, Single-blinded, comparative study of Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway in pediatric patients. Das B; Jamil SN; Mitra S; Varshney RK J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2012 Jul; 28(3):318-21. PubMed ID: 22869936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation. Brimacombe J; Keller C; Brimacombe L Anesth Analg; 2002 Sep; 95(3):770-6, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12198070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) with cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes in infants. Ozden ES; Meco BC; Alanoglu Z; Alkıs N Bosn J Basic Med Sci; 2016 Nov; 16(4):286-291. PubMed ID: 27409643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective randomized comparative study of use of PLMA and ET tube for airway management in children under general anaesthesia. Patel MG; Swadia V; Bansal G Indian J Anaesth; 2010 Mar; 54(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 20661347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Pneumoperitoneum and Lateral Position on Oropharyngeal Seal Pressures of Proseal LMA in Laparoscopic Urological Procedures. Rustagi P; Patkar GA; Ourasang AK; Tendolkar BA J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Feb; 11(2):UC05-UC09. PubMed ID: 28384963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of hemodynamic and metabolic stress responses caused by endotracheal tube and Proseal laryngeal mask airway in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Güleç H; Cakan T; Yaman H; Kilinç AŞ; Başar H J Res Med Sci; 2012 Feb; 17(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 23264788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized controlled trial comparing the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway with the Laryngeal Tube Suction in mechanically ventilated patients. Gaitini LA; Vaida SJ; Somri M; Yanovski B; Ben-David B; Hagberg CA Anesthesiology; 2004 Aug; 101(2):316-20. PubMed ID: 15277913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison between ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and Air-Q Blocker in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gupta R; Mahajan R; Jatinder M; Gulati S; Mehta A; Nazir R J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2019; 35(3):340-347. PubMed ID: 31543582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison and evaluation of single-use LMA supreme versus the reusable proseal LMA in paralyzed patients undergoing surgery with controlled ventilation. Sood S; Chahar S; Thakur A; Gupta M; Saxena A; Subramanian S J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2020; 36(4):494-499. PubMed ID: 33840930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [An auto control comparison of the use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and standard laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation]. Li CW; Xue FS; Mao P; Xu YC; Liu Y; Zhang GH; Liu KP; Sun HT Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2007 Feb; 19(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 17326908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the Laryngeal Tube during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. Cook TM; McKinstry C; Hardy R; Twigg S Br J Anaesth; 2003 Nov; 91(5):678-83. PubMed ID: 14570790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. LMA-Classic and LMA-ProSeal are effective alternatives to endotracheal intubation for gynecologic laparoscopy. Maltby JR; Beriault MT; Watson NC; Liepert DJ; Fick GH Can J Anaesth; 2003 Jan; 50(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 12514155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laryngeal tube S II, ProSeal laryngeal mask, and EasyTube during elective surgery: a randomized controlled comparison with the endotracheal tube in nontrained professionals. Cavus E; Deitmer W; Francksen H; Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Doerges V Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Sep; 26(9):730-5. PubMed ID: 19373095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The comparison of Proseal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia. Saraswat N; Kumar A; Mishra A; Gupta A; Saurabh G; Srivastava U Indian J Anaesth; 2011 Mar; 55(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 21712868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway with the Proseal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed adult patients: a randomized crossover study. Tham HM; Tan SM; Woon KL; Zhao YD Can J Anaesth; 2010 Jul; 57(7):672-8. PubMed ID: 20411444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Two Supraglottic Airway Devices: I-gel Airway and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Following Digital Insertion in Nonparalyzed Anesthetized Patients. Luthra A; Chauhan R; Jain A; Bhukal I; Mahajan S; Bala I Anesth Essays Res; 2019; 13(4):669-675. PubMed ID: 32009713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway size 2 and 2½ in anesthetized and paralyzed pediatric patients with same weight group: A prospective randomized clinical study. Mahajan R; Taxak S Anesth Essays Res; 2014; 8(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 25886330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]